Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
The purpose of grouping these cases together is to give an idea of the frequency and severity of cases, rather than focus on the specifics and details of each individual case.
People often argue that [[circumcision]], as any other surgery, implies a certain level of surgical risk. However, it must be acknowledged that circumcision is in principle an elective surgery (even though the patient most of the times does not get to elect it — being instead FORCED by surrogate consent). This means that these operations didn't have the purpose of treating an existing condition and were not essential to the well-being of the children, so the damage caused by the procedures could have been prevented by leaving their genitals intact.
== What the AAP says ==
=== South Africa lawsuit over botched circumcision ===
The boy, of nine years of age, was [[circumcised ]] 5 years ago, in Barberton Hospital in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barberton,_Mpumalanga Barberton], South Africa. The [[glans ]] was amputated. The intern who performed the procedure reattached the glans, but five days later it separated again. A new procedure was performed to attach it one more time, and it failed again. According to his mother, the boy to this day feels pain when he urinates, and the doctor told her he will need to undergo further medical treatments in order to be able to have sex in the future, and may have some sexual dysfunction related to decreased sensation and inability to reach orgasm due to the [[amputation]] of the glans according to an urologist. There may also be resulting psycho-social problems as a consequence of the [[amputation]], related to low self-esteem.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/r10m-lawsuit-over-botched-circumcision-1.1529015#.UbSA0OfbPQj
|title=R10m lawsuit over botched circumcision
=== 7-year-old loses genitals after circumcision, fighting for life ===
Nov 23, 2012. ''The Times of India'' reported that a 7 year old child was fighting for his life after complications from [[circumcision]]. The boy, Imran, was admitted to Sania hospital in Alwar town on November 10 for circumcision. According to sources, after the operation, some equipment was used to prevent [[bleeding]]. However, electric current accidentally passed into his private parts and the boy suffered serious injury. On November 13, the boy was referred to a private hospital in Jaipur. After investigating the case, the doctors in Jaipur advised the boy's relatives to remove his genitals as it was necessary to save his life. The operation was conducted and his genitals were removed. Three days after the operation, the boy was again admitted to Sania hospital in Alwar.
Imran's grandfather Ayub Khan said: "The circumcision was carried out by Dr Tayyab Khan, a physician at Sania Hospital. He is not a surgeon. The licence of the hospital should be cancelled for carelessness."<ref>{{REFweb
=== Boy pleaded to "just cut it off and (he) can be a girl," ===
Texas, March 2011. A doctor botched a [[circumcision ]] of a 4-year-old Texas boy so badly that the boy pleaded to "just cut it off and (he) can be a girl," the parents claim in court. After excessive [[bleeding]], [[Jennifer_Garza|the doctor]] overcauterized the child's penis, causing fistulas (additional openings) that oozed blood and hurt every time that the child urinated.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/11/09/52144.htm
|title=Circumcision Goes Horribly Wrong
=== The case that would spark the debate in Cologne, Germany in 2012 ===
A 4 year old boy was [[circumcised ]] at the mother's request. There was some persistent [[bleeding]]. The four-year-old was admitted to a children's emergency room two days after his circumcision with [[bleeding]]. So reports the "Frankfurter Allgemeine Sunday newspaper", citing a doctor's letter about the treatment that was then carried out. Apparently a "urological surgical revision" of the circumcision "under general anesthesia" followed. After the surgical intervention the boy was for several days came to a children's ward, it says in the report. Three dressing changes had taken place "under anesthesia". In the doctor's letter also states that the exposed surface and the glans penis was "uneven, eroded, and fibrinous occupied". The boy was ten days in clinical treatment.<ref>{{REFweb
|quote=Penis war „uneben“ und „zerfressen“
|url=http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/penis-war-uneben-und-zerfressen-vierjaehriges-kind-musste-nach-beschneidung-in-die-notaufnahme_aid_782118.html
20,860
edits

Navigation menu