Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rights situation on circumcision

571 bytes added, 17:09, 22 September 2019
m
no edit summary
In Austria, bodily assault is, as in Germany, punishable, without any specific regulations regarding circumcision. There is, however – unlike in Germany - no specific basic right to an unharmed body in the constitution. It is regulated in §146a ABGB that "the application of bodily violence and the infliction of bodily or mental suffering" by the parents is unlawful. According to §90 (3) StGB it is impossible to consent to "a mutilation or other injuring of the genitals, that is able to inflict a lasting impairment of the sexual sensitivity" even for adults. On the other hand, the ''"Israelitengesetz"'' (Law for the Israelites) entitles the Jewish religious group and their members to "bring their children and juveniles, also outside of school, through all traditional rites and to educate them according to their religious commandments". Circumcision of boys for religious reasons is not considered punishable by the Austrian Ministry of Justice, and is justified by the parental rights.
 
=== Belgium ===
The Belgian federal government’s Committee for Bio-Ethics has ruled against the circumcision of infant boys for reasons other than medical necessity. Its ruling states that bodily integrity is more important than religious faith.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.thebulletin.be/ethics-committee-rules-against-infant-circumcision
|title=Ethics committee rules against infant circumcision
|last=Hope
|first=Alan
|publisher=Flanders Today
|website=The Bulletin
|date=2017-09-21
|accessdate=2019-09-22
|format=
|quote=
}}</ref>
=== Germany ===
[[Category:Austria]]
[[Category:Belgium]]
[[Category:Finland]]
[[Category:France]]
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu