Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thomas E. Wiswell

15 bytes added, 23:01, 27 September 2019
m
updated REFbook parameters
Starting in 1983, he began to produce a series of egregiously flawed studies that claimed circumcision reduced the incidence of urinary tract infections.<ref>Wiswell TE, Smith FR, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics 1983 may;75(5):901-3</ref><ref>Wiswell TE. Circumcision and urinary tract infections. Pediatrics 1986; 77: 267-8.</ref><ref>Wiswell TE, Roscelli JD. Corroborative evidence for the decreased incidence of urinary tract infection in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics 1986;78:96-99.</ref><ref>Wiswell TE, Enzenauer RW, Holton ME, Cornish JD, Hankins CT. Declining frequency of circumcision: implications for changes in the absolute incidence and male to female sex ratio of urinary tract infections in early infancy. Pediatrics 1987; 79: 338-42.</ref><ref>Wiswell TE, Hachey WE. Urinary tract infections and the uncircumcised state: an update. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1993; 32: 130-4.</ref> All have long since been thoroughly discredited.<ref>AAP Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision Policy Statement. Pediatrics 1999;103(3):686-693.</ref><ref>Van Howe RS. Effect of confounding in the association between circumcision status and urinary tract infection. J Infect 2005;51(1):59-68.</ref> Wiswell associates with the [[Gilgal Society]],<ref>{{REFbook
| last=Morris | first=Brian |author-link=Brian J. Morris | year=2007 | title=Sex and circumcision: What every woman needs to know | url=http://www.circinfo.net/pdfs/GFW-EN%200712-1.pdf | editor=Vernon Quaintance | edition= | volume= | chapter= | pages= | location=London, England | publisher=Gilgal Society | isbn= | note= | accessdate=
}}</ref> a [[circumfetish]] group.<ref>{{REFbook
| last=Thomas
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,197
edits

Navigation menu