Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Arguments pro circumcision

39 bytes added, 14:10, 18 October 2019
m
no edit summary
|date=January 1999
|accessdate=2019-10-18
}}</ref>
*: "The [[foreskin]] has a number of tasks and functions. The glands which can be found in the inner [[foreskin]], produce a secretion that keeps the [[Glans penis|glans]] soft and supple. The so-called smegma is used to obtain a stable bacterial flora in the genital area of ​​men and to protect them from diseases. It protects against infection, which may also affect the urethra, since its task is the natural hygiene of the [[Glans penis|glans]]."<ref>{{REFweb
|url=http://symptomat.de/Penisvorhaut#Funktion_.26_Aufgaben_der_Penisvorhaut
*: This so-called 'backyard' argument can be applied to almost all statutory, punitive bans and is just absurd. It is also listed in debates about drug addiction, abortion and [[FGM|female genital mutilation]]. During the [[Circumcision Debate]] 2012 in Germany, the author [[Harald Stücker]] has explained in a recommended article<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://evidentist.wordpress.com/2012/11/19/beschneidung-im-hinterhof-legalize-it/
|title=Beschneidung im Hinterhof: Legalize it?!
|trans-title=Circumcision in the backyard: Legalize it?!
|language=German
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu