Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision

10 bytes removed, 11:43, 3 November 2019
no edit summary
[[File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|thumb|upright=0.3]]
The medical ethics committee of the [[British Medical Association]] also reviewed the ethics behind circumcision. Since circumcision has associated medical and psychological risks with no unequivocally proven medical benefits, they advise physicians to keep up with clinical evidence and only perform this procedure if it's in the child best interest.<ref name=":02">Committee on Medical Ethics. [http://www.bma.org.uk/-/media/Files/PDFs/Practical%20advice%20at%20workadvice at work/Ethics/Circumcision.pdf The law & ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors]; June 2006 [Retrieved 25 3 November 20132019.].</ref> However, they acknowledge the procedure as a cultural and religious practice, which may be an important ritual for the child's incorporation into the group.<ref name=":02"/> They recognize that parents have the authority to make choices for their child, and they emphasize it is important for parents to act in their child's best interest.<ref name=":02"/> They ultimately report that views vary in their community about the benefits and risks of the procedure, and there is no clear policy for this situation.<ref name=":02"/>
Commenting on the development of the 2003 British Medical Association guidance on circumcision, Mussell (2004) reports that debate in society is highly polarized, and he attributes it to the different faiths and cultures that make up BMA.<ref name=":1">{{REFjournal
17,052
edits

Navigation menu