17,052
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
{{Construction Site}}
The practice of non-therapeutic circumcision, which is rooted in antiquity, and started in the 19th century for alleged medical reasons, predates the inauguration of the human rights era in 1945. The advent of and recognition of human rights for all (including patients) has profoundly altered medical ethics and the acceptability of non-therapeutic child circumcision.
==History==
The era of human rights may be considered to have started with the formation of the United Nations at San Francisco in 1945 because the ''Charter of the United Nations '' requires that body to promote universal respect and observance of human rights for all — without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.<ref>{{REFdocument
|title=Charter of the United Nations
|url=https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CTC/uncharter.pdf
}}</ref>
The General Assembly of the United Nations, acting to fulfill its obligations under the Charter, adopted the ''Universal Declaration of Human Rights '' (UDHR) in 1948.<ref>{{REFdocument |title=Universal Declaration of Human Rights , G.A. res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc A/810 at 71 (1948).
|url=https://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf
|contribution=
|date=1948
|accessdate=2019-11-04
}}</ref>The UDHR recognizes the rights of all to security of the person (Article 3), to freedom from inhuman, cruel, or degrading treatment (Article 5), and the rights of motherhood and childhood to special protection (Article 25.2), all of which are applicable to circumcision. The General Assembly adopted the ''International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights'' (ICCPR) in 1966. That Covenant, which is international law, has several provisions, which are applicable to the circumcision of children.
{{REF}}