Difference between revisions of "Intact-friendly"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add citation.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text and citation.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Intact-friend''' and '''foreskin-friendly''' are terms used in the [[United States]], where [[circumcision]] has been generally practiced, to describe health-care providers who are knowledgeable regarding care of the natural [[penis]] with a [[foreskin]]. | + | '''Intact-friend''' and '''foreskin-friendly''' are terms used in the [[United States]], where non-therapeutic male of boys [[circumcision]] has been generally practiced, to describe health-care providers who are knowledgeable regarding care of the natural [[penis]] with a [[foreskin]]. |
The extraordinary ignorance of many American health-care providers regarding the human foreskin, a natural body part, makes these terms necessary.<ref>{{REFjournal | The extraordinary ignorance of many American health-care providers regarding the human foreskin, a natural body part, makes these terms necessary.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|pages= | |pages= | ||
|accessdate=2022-09-09 | |accessdate=2022-09-09 | ||
| − | }}</ref> It is said that the only thing doctors learn in medical school about the human foreskin is that it is to be cut off! | + | }}</ref> It is said that the only thing doctors learn in medical school about the human foreskin is that it is to be cut off! |
| + | Parents need to be especially wary at their [[intact]] son's visit to a doctor for any reason.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Narvaez | ||
| + | |first=Darcia | ||
| + | |init= | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |last2=Geisheker | ||
| + | |init2=JV | ||
| + | |author2-link=John V. Geisheker | ||
| + | |url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201110/what-is-the-greatest-danger-uncircumcised-boy | ||
| + | |title=What Is the Greatest Danger for an Uncircumcised Boy? | ||
| + | |journal=Psychology Today | ||
| + | |date=2011-10-23 | ||
| + | |volume= | ||
| + | |issue= | ||
| + | |pages= | ||
| + | |accessdate=2022-09-09 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
It is very common for American doctors to forcibly retract a young boys non-retractile foreskin, thereby causing great injury and [[pain]].<ref>{{REFweb | It is very common for American doctors to forcibly retract a young boys non-retractile foreskin, thereby causing great injury and [[pain]].<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-parents/help-with-forcible-foreskin-retraction/ | |url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-parents/help-with-forcible-foreskin-retraction/ | ||
Revision as of 03:50, 10 September 2022
Intact-friend and foreskin-friendly are terms used in the United States, where non-therapeutic male of boys circumcision has been generally practiced, to describe health-care providers who are knowledgeable regarding care of the natural penis with a foreskin.
The extraordinary ignorance of many American health-care providers regarding the human foreskin, a natural body part, makes these terms necessary.[1] It is said that the only thing doctors learn in medical school about the human foreskin is that it is to be cut off!
Parents need to be especially wary at their intact son's visit to a doctor for any reason.[2] It is very common for American doctors to forcibly retract a young boys non-retractile foreskin, thereby causing great injury and pain.[3]
References
- ↑
Narvaev, Darcia F., Geisheker JV. Doctor ignorance of normal foreskin anatomy harms boys. Psychology Today. 30 October 2011; Retrieved 9 September 2022.
- ↑ Narvaez, Darcia, Geisheker JV. What Is the Greatest Danger for an Uncircumcised Boy?. Psychology Today. 23 October 2011; Retrieved 9 September 2022.
- ↑
Geisheker, John V. (April 2016). Wrongful foreskin retraction
, Doctors Opposing Circumcision. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
