Difference between revisions of "American urologists and the practice of male circumcision"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Create page.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Construction Site}} | {{Construction Site}} | ||
There are many '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''. | There are many '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''. | ||
| + | ==Lack of experience with a normal body part== | ||
| + | American male urologists are drawn from the general population in which the great majority of males have received a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]], so they have no personal experience of the functions and sensations from the natural [[intact]] [[foreskin]]. | ||
| + | American female urologists don't have male body parts so they have no experience at all of the functions and sensations of the natural intact foreskin. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This abysmal state of ignorance cannot serve the patients well. | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 8 April 2023
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
There are many American urologists and the practice of male circumcision.
Lack of experience with a normal body part
American male urologists are drawn from the general population in which the great majority of males have received a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic infant circumcision, so they have no personal experience of the functions and sensations from the natural intact foreskin.
American female urologists don't have male body parts so they have no experience at all of the functions and sensations of the natural intact foreskin.
This abysmal state of ignorance cannot serve the patients well.