Difference between revisions of "American urologists and the practice of male circumcision"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add section.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (→Lack of experience with a normal body part: Add text and citations.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There are many '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''. | There are many '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}'''. | ||
==Lack of experience with a normal body part== | ==Lack of experience with a normal body part== | ||
| − | American male urologists are drawn from the general population in which the great majority of males have received a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]], so most have no personal experience of the functions<ref>{{REFweb | + | American male urologists are drawn from the general population in which the great majority of males have received a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic infant [[circumcision]],<ref name="laumann1997">{{REFjournal |
| + | |last=Laumann | ||
| + | |first=Edward O. | ||
| + | |init= | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |last2=Masi | ||
| + | |first2=christopher M. | ||
| + | |init2= | ||
| + | |author2-link= | ||
| + | |last3=Zuckerman | ||
| + | |first3=Ezra W. | ||
| + | |init3= | ||
| + | |author3-link= | ||
| + | |etal=no | ||
| + | |title=Circumcision in the United States | ||
| + | |journal=JAMA | ||
| + | |location= | ||
| + | |date=1997-04-02 | ||
| + | |volume=277 | ||
| + | |issue=13 | ||
| + | |article= | ||
| + | |pages=1052-7 | ||
| + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/general/laumann/ | ||
| + | |pubmedID=9091693 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI= | ||
| + | |accessdate=2023-04-08 | ||
| + | }}</ref> so most have no personal experience of the functions<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|url=http://www.intactaus.org/information/functionsoftheforeskin/ | |url=http://www.intactaus.org/information/functionsoftheforeskin/ | ||
|title=Functions of the Foreskin | |title=Functions of the Foreskin | ||
| Line 14: | Line 41: | ||
|format= | |format= | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
| − | }}</ref> and sensations from the natural [[intact]] [[foreskin]]. | + | }}</ref> and [[Foreskin sensitivity| sensations]] from the natural [[intact]] [[foreskin]]. American female urologists don't have male body parts so they also have no experience at all of the functions and sensations of the natural intact foreskin. |
| − | |||
| − | American female urologists don't have male body parts so they have no experience at all of the functions and | ||
This abysmal state of ignorance cannot serve the patients well. | This abysmal state of ignorance cannot serve the patients well. | ||
Revision as of 20:55, 8 April 2023
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
There are many American urologists and the practice of male circumcision.
Lack of experience with a normal body part
American male urologists are drawn from the general population in which the great majority of males have received a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic infant circumcision,[1] so most have no personal experience of the functions[2] and sensations from the natural intact foreskin. American female urologists don't have male body parts so they also have no experience at all of the functions and sensations of the natural intact foreskin.
This abysmal state of ignorance cannot serve the patients well.
References
- ↑
Laumann, Edward O., Masi, christopher M., Zuckerman, Ezra W.. Circumcision in the United States. JAMA. 2 April 1997; 277(13): 1052-7. PMID. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
- ↑
Helard, Lou (1 August 2014). Functions of the Foreskin
, Intact Australia. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
