Extensive penile skin defect: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Extensive penile skin defects/avulsion''' are unfortunate occurrences of male [[circumcision]]. Avulsion is the forcible tearing away of a body part by trauma or surgery.<ref>{{REFweb
+'''Extensive penile skin defects''' and '''[[avulsion]]s''' are unfortunate occurrences of male [[circumcision]]. [[Avulsion]] is the forcible tearing away of a body part by [[trauma]] or surgery.<ref>{{REFweb
   |url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/avulsion
- |archived=
   |title=Avulsion
- |trans-title=
- |language=
- |last=
- |first=
- |author-link=
   |publisher=The Free Dictionary
- |website=
   |date=2004
   |accessdate=2022-01-23
- |format=
- |quote=
 }}</ref>
-Bode et al. (2010) reported 23 very serious injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circucision ring. There was extensive skin loss in 17(74%) babies. Urethrocutaneous ﬁstulae were the result in nine (39%) of these cases, while partial necrosis of the [[glans penis]] occurred in four (17%).<ref name="bode2010">{{REFjournal
+Bode et al. (2010) reported 23 very serious injuries from proximal migration of the [[Plastibell]] circumcision ring. There was extensive skin loss in 17 (74%) babies. [[Urethral fistula| Urethrocutaneous ﬁstulae]] were the result in nine (39%) of these cases, while partial [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]] occurred in four (17%).<ref name="bode2010">{{REFjournal
   |last=Bode
   |first=
@@ Line 31: / Line 22: @@
   |etal=no
   |title=Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring
- |trans-title=
- |language=
   |journal=J Pediatr Urol
   |location=
@@ Line 50: / Line 39: @@
 }}</ref>
+Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 [[complication]]s of child [[circumcision]] in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant [[prepuce]] (51, [14.7%]), [[haemorrhage]] (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound [[infection]]s and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).<ref name="osifo2010">{{REFjournal
+ |last=Osifo
+ |first=
+ |init=OD
+ |author-link=
+ |last2=Oriaifo
+ |first2=
+ |init2=IA
+ |author2-link=
+ |etal=no
+ |title=Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children
+ |journal=Ann Afr Med
+ |location=
+ |date=2009-10
+ |volume=8
+ |issue=4
+ |article=
+ |page=
+ |pages=266-70
+ |url=https://www.annalsafrmed.org/article.asp?issn=1596-3519;year=2009;volume=8;issue=4;spage=266;epage=270;aulast=Osifo
+ |archived=
+ |quote=
+ |pubmedID=20139551
+ |pubmedCID=
+ |DOI=10.4103/1596-3519.59583
+ |accessdate=2022-01-23
+}}</ref>
+Gao & Qu (2019) presented the case of a 31-year-old man who presented with extensive defects in his [[penile skin]], [[infection]], and [[necrosis]] following a [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]]. A reverse bilateral anterior [[Scrotal skin|scrotal flap]] was used to correct complete [[penile skin]] loss following debridement of the infected and [[Necrosis|necrotic tissue]].<ref name="gao2019">{{REFjournal
+ |last=Gao
+ |first=
+ |init=QG
+ |author-link=
+ |last2=Qu
+ |first2=
+ |init2=W
+ |author2-link=
+ |etal=no
+ |title=Penile resurfacing using a reverse bilateral anterior scrotal artery flap
+ |journal= Medicine (Baltimore)
+ |location=
+ |date=2019-12
+ |volume=98
+ |issue=49
+ |article=
+ |page=:e18106
+ |pages=
+ |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6919477/
+ |archived=
+ |quote=
+ |pubmedID=31804321
+ |pubmedCID=6919477
+ |DOI=10.1097/MD.0000000000018106.
+ |accessdate=2022-01-23
+}}</ref>
+{{REF}}
- {{REF}}
+[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
+[[Category:Circumcision term]]
-[[Category:Term]]
+[[de:Ausgedehnter Penishautdefekt]]
-[[Category:Circumcision complications]]