Difference between revisions of "Extensive penile skin defect"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (changed category)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Extensive penile skin defects/avulsion''' are unfortunate occurrences of male [[circumcision]]. Avulsion is the forcible tearing away of a body part by trauma or surgery.<ref>{{REFweb
+
'''Extensive penile skin defects''' and '''[[avulsion]]s''' are unfortunate occurrences of male [[circumcision]]. [[Avulsion]] is the forcible tearing away of a body part by [[trauma]] or surgery.<ref>{{REFweb
 
  |url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/avulsion
 
  |url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/avulsion
|archived=
 
 
  |title=Avulsion
 
  |title=Avulsion
|trans-title=
 
|language=
 
|last=
 
|first=
 
|author-link=
 
 
  |publisher=The Free Dictionary
 
  |publisher=The Free Dictionary
|website=
 
 
  |date=2004
 
  |date=2004
 
  |accessdate=2022-01-23
 
  |accessdate=2022-01-23
|format=
 
|quote=
 
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
  
Bode et al. (2010) reported 23 very serious injuries from proximal migration of the [[Plastibell]] circumcision ring. There was extensive skin loss in 17(74%) babies. [[Urethral fistula| Urethrocutaneous fistulae]] were the result in nine (39%) of these cases, while partial [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]] occurred in four (17%).<ref name="bode2010">{{REFjournal
+
Bode et al. (2010) reported 23 very serious injuries from proximal migration of the [[Plastibell]] circumcision ring. There was extensive skin loss in 17 (74%) babies. [[Urethral fistula| Urethrocutaneous fistulae]] were the result in nine (39%) of these cases, while partial [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]] occurred in four (17%).<ref name="bode2010">{{REFjournal
 
  |last=Bode
 
  |last=Bode
 
  |first=
 
  |first=
Line 31: Line 22:
 
  |etal=no
 
  |etal=no
 
  |title=Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring
 
  |title=Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring
|trans-title=
 
|language=
 
 
  |journal=J Pediatr Urol
 
  |journal=J Pediatr Urol
 
  |location=
 
  |location=
Line 50: Line 39:
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
  
Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 complications of child circumcision in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant prepuce (51, [14.7%]), hemorrhage (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [Figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound infections and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).<ref name="osifo2010">{{REFjournal
+
Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 [[complication]]s of child [[circumcision]] in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant [[prepuce]] (51, [14.7%]), [[haemorrhage]] (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound [[infection]]s and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).<ref name="osifo2010">{{REFjournal
 
  |last=Osifo
 
  |last=Osifo
 
  |first=
 
  |first=
Line 61: Line 50:
 
  |etal=no
 
  |etal=no
 
  |title=Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children
 
  |title=Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children
|trans-title=
 
|language=
 
 
  |journal=Ann Afr Med
 
  |journal=Ann Afr Med
 
  |location=
 
  |location=
Line 80: Line 67:
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
  
  {{REF}}
+
Gao & Qu (2019) presented the case of a 31-year-old man who presented with extensive defects in his [[penile skin]], [[infection]], and [[necrosis]] following a [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]]. A reverse bilateral anterior [[Scrotal skin|scrotal flap]] was used to correct complete [[penile skin]] loss following debridement of the infected and [[Necrosis|necrotic tissue]].<ref name="gao2019">{{REFjournal
 +
  |last=Gao
 +
|first=
 +
|init=QG
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Qu
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=W
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Penile resurfacing using a reverse bilateral anterior scrotal artery flap
 +
|journal= Medicine (Baltimore)
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2019-12
 +
|volume=98
 +
|issue=49
 +
|article=
 +
|page=:e18106
 +
|pages=
 +
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6919477/
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=31804321
 +
|pubmedCID=6919477
 +
|DOI=10.1097/MD.0000000000018106.
 +
|accessdate=2022-01-23
 +
}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
{{REF}}
  
[[Category:Term]]
 
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
 +
[[Category:Circumcision term]]
 +
 +
[[de:Ausgedehnter Penishautdefekt]]

Latest revision as of 06:50, 18 August 2023

Extensive penile skin defects and avulsions are unfortunate occurrences of male circumcision. Avulsion is the forcible tearing away of a body part by trauma or surgery.[1]

Bode et al. (2010) reported 23 very serious injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring. There was extensive skin loss in 17 (74%) babies. Urethrocutaneous fistulae were the result in nine (39%) of these cases, while partial necrosis of the glans penis occurred in four (17%).[2]

Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 complications of child circumcision in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant prepuce (51, [14.7%]), haemorrhage (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound infections and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).[3]

Gao & Qu (2019) presented the case of a 31-year-old man who presented with extensive defects in his penile skin, infection, and necrosis following a circumcision. A reverse bilateral anterior scrotal flap was used to correct complete penile skin loss following debridement of the infected and necrotic tissue.[4]

References

  1. REFweb (2004). Avulsion, The Free Dictionary. Retrieved 23 January 2022.
  2. REFjournal Bode CO, Ikhisemojie S, Ademuyiwa AO. Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring. J Pediatr Urol. February 2010; 6(1): 23-7. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
  3. REFjournal Osifo OD, Oriaifo IA. Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children. Ann Afr Med. October 2009; 8(4): 266-70. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 23 January 2022.
  4. REFjournal Gao QG, Qu W. Penile resurfacing using a reverse bilateral anterior scrotal artery flap. Medicine (Baltimore). December 2019; 98(49): :e18106. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 23 January 2022.