Difference between revisions of "Intraperitoneal bladder perforation"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (added interwiki link)
(Add SEEALSO section; Add LINKS section; Wikify.)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
  |author4-link=
 
  |author4-link=
 
  |etal=no
 
  |etal=no
  |title=Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell Device
+
  |title=Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the [[Plastibell]] device
 
  |trans-title=
 
  |trans-title=
 
  |language=
 
  |language=
Line 37: Line 37:
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
  
The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]].<ref>{{REFweb
+
The seventy-year-old [[Plastibell]] device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]].<ref>{{REFweb
 
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html
 
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html
 
  |archived=
 
  |archived=
Line 102: Line 102:
 
  |page=
 
  |page=
 
  |pages=311-2
 
  |pages=311-2
  |url=
+
  |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2528673/
 
  |archived=
 
  |archived=
 
  |quote=
 
  |quote=
Line 109: Line 109:
 
  |DOI=
 
  |DOI=
 
  |accessdate=2022-02-18
 
  |accessdate=2022-02-18
}}</ref>  so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision with a Plastibell device.
+
}}</ref>  so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] with a [[Plastibell]] device.
 +
{{SEEALSO}}
 +
* [[Device displacement]]
 +
{{LINKS}}
 +
* [https://www.cirp.org/library/death/ Deaths]
  
 
{{REF}}  
 
{{REF}}  
  
 +
[[Category:Canada]]
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
 +
[[Category:Medical ethics]]
 +
  
 
[[de:Intraperitoneale Blasenperforation]]
 
[[de:Intraperitoneale Blasenperforation]]

Revision as of 14:05, 26 December 2023

Intraperitoneal bladder perforation is an iatrogenic complication of using the Plastibell device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision of an infant boy.[1]

The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including necrosis of the glans penis.[2] [3] There is a history of Plastibell migration causing death of a previously healthy baby boy,[4] so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision with a Plastibell device.

See also

External links

References

  1. REFjournal Dwyer, Moira, Peffer, Nathan, Fuller, Thomas, Cannon, Glenn. Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell device. Urology. March 2016; 89: 134-6. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
  2. REFweb Day, Danielle (2010). The Perils of Plastibell Circumcision: A Mythical "No Cutting, No Risk" Method, Peaceful Parenting. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
  3. REFjournal Aminsharifi A, Afsar F, Tourchi A. Delayed Glans Necrosis after Circumcision: Role of Testosterone in Salvaging Glans. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. September 2013; 80(9): 791-3. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
  4. REFjournal Coroner, Chief. Circumcision: A minor procedure?. Paediatr Child Health. April 2007; 12(4): 311-2. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 18 February 2022.