Difference between revisions of "Redundant foreskin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Create page.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text and citation.) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Insufficient foreskin removal | + | '''Redundant foreskin''' (aka '''Insufficient foreskin removal''') is classed technically as a [[complication]]. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected [[circumcised]] appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal |
|last=Fekete | |last=Fekete | ||
|first=Ferenc | |first=Ferenc | ||
| − | |init= | + | |init=F |
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
|last2=Török | |last2=Török | ||
|first2=Alexander | |first2=Alexander | ||
| − | |init2= | + | |init2=A |
|author2-link= | |author2-link= | ||
|last3=Nyirády | |last3=Nyirády | ||
|first3=Peter | |first3=Peter | ||
| − | |init3= | + | |init3=P |
|author3-link= | |author3-link= | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions | |title=Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=Int Urol Nephrol | |journal=Int Urol Nephrol | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 32: | Line 30: | ||
|accessdate=2022-02-04 | |accessdate=2022-02-04 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is no accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]]. | ||
| + | ==Acroposthion== | ||
| + | A longer [[foreskin]] that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an [[acroposthion]], that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.<ref name="hodges2001">{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Hodges | ||
| + | |first=Frederick M. | ||
| + | |author-link=Frederick M. Hodges | ||
| + | |etal=no | ||
| + | |title=The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme | ||
| + | |trans-title= | ||
| + | |language= | ||
| + | |journal=Bull. Hist. Med | ||
| + | |location= | ||
| + | |date=2001-09 | ||
| + | |volume=75 | ||
| + | |issue=3 | ||
| + | |pages=375-405 | ||
| + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/history/hodges2/ | ||
| + | |quote= | ||
| + | |pubmedID=11568485 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1353/bhm.2001.0119 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2019-11-15 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | * [[Unsatisfactory cosmetic results including uncircumcised appearance]] | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
| + | [[Category:Circumcision complication]] | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[de:Überflüssige Vorhaut]] |
Latest revision as of 01:00, 24 June 2024
Redundant foreskin (aka Insufficient foreskin removal) is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]
There is no accepted definition of redundant foreskin.
Acroposthion
A longer foreskin that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an acroposthion, that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.[2]
See also
References
- ↑
Fekete F, Török A, Nyirády P. Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions. Int Urol Nephrol. June 2011; 43(2): 431-5. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
- ↑ Hodges, Frederick M.. The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme. Bull. Hist. Med. September 2001; 75(3): 375-405. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 November 2019.
