Difference between revisions of "Redundant foreskin"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Wikify.)
(Add text and citation.)
 
Line 32: Line 32:
  
 
There is no accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]].
 
There is no accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]].
 +
==Acroposthion==
 +
A longer [[foreskin]] that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an [[acroposthion]], that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.<ref name="hodges2001">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Hodges
 +
|first=Frederick M.
 +
|author-link=Frederick M. Hodges
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=Bull. Hist. Med
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2001-09
 +
|volume=75
 +
|issue=3
 +
|pages=375-405
 +
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/history/hodges2/
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=11568485
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1353/bhm.2001.0119
 +
|accessdate=2019-11-15
 +
}}</ref>
 +
  
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}

Latest revision as of 01:00, 24 June 2024

Redundant foreskin (aka Insufficient foreskin removal) is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]

There is no accepted definition of redundant foreskin.

Acroposthion

A longer foreskin that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an acroposthion, that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.[2]


See also

References