Difference between revisions of "Google bias on circumcision"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (Revise text.) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is evident when one runs searches at Google regarding [[circumcision]]. A search for "circumcision information for parents" produced a list of about 230 promotional pages produced by various institutional and individual vendors of circumcision who profit from the performance of [[circumcision]], so are highly biased. No pages by opponents of circumcision such as [[Intact America]], [[Saving Our Sons]], or [[IntactiWiki]] were provided. | |
| − | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is evident when one runs searches at Google regarding circumcision. A search for "circumcision information for parents" produced a list of about 230 promotional pages produced by institutional and individual vendors of circumcision who profit from the performance of [[circumcision]], so are highly biased. No pages by opponents of circumcision were provided. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | Separate searches for those named organizations did produce a link to their webpage but one has to type in their exact name to see it. | ||
| + | Other searches for circumcision, will produce known biased sources such as [[Wikipedia bias on circumcision| Wikipedia]], the [[Care_of_intact,_foreskinned_boys#Mayo_Clinic_information_should_be_rejected| Mayo Clinic]], and [[Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health]]. The IntactiWiki page, ''[[Circumcision bullet-points for parents]]'', can only be found if the title of the page is enclosed in quotation marks. | ||
| + | Alternative search engines may produce more balanced results than Google. | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Wikipedia bias on circumcision]] | * [[Wikipedia bias on circumcision]] | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* {{URLwebsite|https://www.google.com|2024-09-02}} | * {{URLwebsite|https://www.google.com|2024-09-02}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Bias]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Database]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Parental information]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:50, 3 September 2024
Google bias on circumcision is evident when one runs searches at Google regarding circumcision. A search for "circumcision information for parents" produced a list of about 230 promotional pages produced by various institutional and individual vendors of circumcision who profit from the performance of circumcision, so are highly biased. No pages by opponents of circumcision such as Intact America, Saving Our Sons, or IntactiWiki were provided.
Separate searches for those named organizations did produce a link to their webpage but one has to type in their exact name to see it.
Other searches for circumcision, will produce known biased sources such as Wikipedia, the Mayo Clinic, and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The IntactiWiki page, Circumcision bullet-points for parents, can only be found if the title of the page is enclosed in quotation marks.
Alternative search engines may produce more balanced results than Google.
See also
External links
Official website. Retrieved 2 September 2024
