Circumcision: The Painful Dilemma: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)

Line 8:

|Editor=[[Ulf Dunkel]]

|Date=2021-03-27

|Publisher=KDP

|Publisher=[[KDP]]

|ISBN=979-8683021252

}}

Line 25:

''I did not start my research being anti-circumcision.'' I was even undecided over whether or not I would choose circumcision again should I ever have another son. I fully intended to write a book that was ''neutral'' on the subject. I had planned that this book would present the pros and cons of both choices, guiding parents to either direction as best suits their lifestyles.

I began this research with the American middle class belief that male circumcision surely conferred many benefits. Therefore I did not skew the results of my research nor the personal accounts herein to conform to a pre-conceived anti-circumcision bias. Instead, it has been the personal accounts and facts that have educated me.

I began this research with the American middle class belief that male circumcision surely conferred many benefits. Therefore I did not skew the results of my research nor the personal accounts herein to conform to a pre-conceived anti-circumcision bias. Instead, it has been the personal accounts and facts that have educated ''me.''

The personal accounts in this book tell many stories. Some are from parents of circumcised sons, all expressing remorse over their decision. Some are from parents of intact sons, all expressing peace and satisfaction with their choice. ''I have not received any letters from parents of circumcised sons who were happy about their decision, nor any letters from parents of intact sons who were unhappy about it.''

Line 46:

[[Category:Intactivist literature]]

[[Category:Literature]]

[[Category:Sociology]]

[[de:Beschneidung: Das schmerzhafte Dilemma]]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
   |Editor=[[Ulf Dunkel]]
   |Date=2021-03-27
-  |Publisher=KDP
+  |Publisher=[[KDP]]
   |ISBN=979-8683021252
 }}
@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ''I did not start my research being anti-circumcision.'' I was even undecided over whether or not I would choose circumcision again should I ever have another son. I fully intended to write a book that was ''neutral'' on the subject. I had planned that this book would present the pros and cons of both choices, guiding parents to either direction as best suits their lifestyles.
-I began this research with the American middle class belief that male circumcision surely conferred many benefits. Therefore I did not skew the results of my research nor the personal accounts herein to conform to a pre-conceived anti-circumcision bias. Instead, it has been the personal accounts and facts that have educated me.
+I began this research with the American middle class belief that male circumcision surely conferred many benefits. Therefore I did not skew the results of my research nor the personal accounts herein to conform to a pre-conceived anti-circumcision bias. Instead, it has been the personal accounts and facts that have educated ''me.''
 The personal accounts in this book tell many stories. Some are from parents of circumcised sons, all expressing remorse over their decision. Some are from parents of intact sons, all expressing peace and satisfaction with their choice. ''I have not received any letters from parents of circumcised sons who were happy about their decision, nor any letters from parents of intact sons who were unhappy about it.''
@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 [[Category:Intactivist literature]]
 [[Category:Literature]]
+[[Category:Sociology]]
 [[de:Beschneidung: Das schmerzhafte Dilemma]]