Difference between revisions of "Whose Body, Whose Rights?"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (added AAPB link)
(Add text note.)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Examining the Ethics and the Human Rights Issue of Infant Male Circumcision
+
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' examines the Ethics and the Human Rights Issue of Infant Male Circumcision.
  
 
Dillonwood productions, 1995
 
Dillonwood productions, 1995
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
== Video links ==
 
== Video links ==
 +
<br>
 
<youtube>8GmIQH-Dujs</youtube>
 
<youtube>8GmIQH-Dujs</youtube>
 
+
<br>
 
<youtube>5JsieythZvU</youtube>
 
<youtube>5JsieythZvU</youtube>
 
+
<br>
In a new era of children's rights, this independently produced two-part social issue documentary compassionately explores genital mutilation of unconsenting children, euphemistically termed "circumcision." It boldly and responsibly addresses these vital issues long overdue for inner reflection and cultural self-examination:
+
In a new era of children's rights, this independently produced two-part social issue documentary compassionately explores genital mutilation of non-consenting children, euphemistically termed "[[circumcision]]." It boldly and responsibly addresses these vital issues long overdue for inner reflection and cultural self-examination:
  
 
* history and medical ethics
 
* history and medical ethics
Line 24: Line 25:
  
 
{{LINKS}}
 
{{LINKS}}
 +
These links provide information about the film.
 
* {{REFweb
 
* {{REFweb
 
  |url=http://www.circumcisionvideos.com/wbwr.htm
 
  |url=http://www.circumcisionvideos.com/wbwr.htm

Latest revision as of 14:58, 16 October 2022

Whose Body, Whose Rights? examines the Ethics and the Human Rights Issue of Infant Male Circumcision.

Dillonwood productions, 1995

Executive producer: Tim Hammond

Video links




In a new era of children's rights, this independently produced two-part social issue documentary compassionately explores genital mutilation of non-consenting children, euphemistically termed "circumcision." It boldly and responsibly addresses these vital issues long overdue for inner reflection and cultural self-examination:

  • history and medical ethics
  • consequences of circumcision
  • evolving religious attitudes
  • legal and constitutional issues
  • foreskin functions
  • men's awareness and uncircumcision
  • medical conscientious objection
  • children's rights

Recipient of the Creative Excellence award at the 1996 U.S. International Film and Video Festival, Honorable Mention at the 1996 Philadelphia Film Festival, and Best of Festival at the First Annual Stark Video & Film Festival (1997).

External links

These links provide information about the film.