Difference between revisions of "Extensive penile skin defect"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text and citation; Wikify.) |
m (changed category) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Extensive penile skin defects | + | '''Extensive penile skin defects''' and '''[[avulsion]]s''' are unfortunate occurrences of male [[circumcision]]. [[Avulsion]] is the forcible tearing away of a body part by [[trauma]] or surgery.<ref>{{REFweb |
|url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/avulsion | |url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/avulsion | ||
| − | |||
|title=Avulsion | |title=Avulsion | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|publisher=The Free Dictionary | |publisher=The Free Dictionary | ||
| − | |||
|date=2004 | |date=2004 | ||
|accessdate=2022-01-23 | |accessdate=2022-01-23 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 22: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring | |title=Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=J Pediatr Urol | |journal=J Pediatr Urol | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 50: | Line 39: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 | + | Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 [[complication]]s of child [[circumcision]] in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant [[prepuce]] (51, [14.7%]), [[haemorrhage]] (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound [[infection]]s and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).<ref name="osifo2010">{{REFjournal |
|last=Osifo | |last=Osifo | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 61: | Line 50: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children | |title=Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=Ann Afr Med | |journal=Ann Afr Med | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 80: | Line 67: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | Gao & Qu (2019) presented the case of a 31-year-old man who presented with extensive defects in his penile skin, [[infection]], and [[necrosis]] following a [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]]. A reverse bilateral anterior scrotal flap was used to correct complete penile skin loss following debridement of the infected and necrotic tissue.<ref name="gao2019">{{REFjournal | + | Gao & Qu (2019) presented the case of a 31-year-old man who presented with extensive defects in his [[penile skin]], [[infection]], and [[necrosis]] following a [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]]. A reverse bilateral anterior [[Scrotal skin|scrotal flap]] was used to correct complete [[penile skin]] loss following debridement of the infected and [[Necrosis|necrotic tissue]].<ref name="gao2019">{{REFjournal |
|last=Gao | |last=Gao | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 91: | Line 78: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Penile resurfacing using a reverse bilateral anterior scrotal artery flap | |title=Penile resurfacing using a reverse bilateral anterior scrotal artery flap | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal= Medicine (Baltimore) | |journal= Medicine (Baltimore) | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 110: | Line 95: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | + | {{REF}} | |
| − | |||
[[Category:Circumcision complication]] | [[Category:Circumcision complication]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Circumcision term]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[de:Ausgedehnter Penishautdefekt]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:50, 18 August 2023
Extensive penile skin defects and avulsions are unfortunate occurrences of male circumcision. Avulsion is the forcible tearing away of a body part by trauma or surgery.[1]
Bode et al. (2010) reported 23 very serious injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring. There was extensive skin loss in 17 (74%) babies. Urethrocutaneous fistulae were the result in nine (39%) of these cases, while partial necrosis of the glans penis occurred in four (17%).[2]
Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 complications of child circumcision in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant prepuce (51, [14.7%]), haemorrhage (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound infections and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).[3]
Gao & Qu (2019) presented the case of a 31-year-old man who presented with extensive defects in his penile skin, infection, and necrosis following a circumcision. A reverse bilateral anterior scrotal flap was used to correct complete penile skin loss following debridement of the infected and necrotic tissue.[4]
References
- ↑
(2004). Avulsion
, The Free Dictionary. Retrieved 23 January 2022. - ↑
Bode CO, Ikhisemojie S, Ademuyiwa AO. Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring. J Pediatr Urol. February 2010; 6(1): 23-7. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
- ↑ Osifo OD, Oriaifo IA. Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children. Ann Afr Med. October 2009; 8(4): 266-70. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 23 January 2022.
- ↑ Gao QG, Qu W. Penile resurfacing using a reverse bilateral anterior scrotal artery flap. Medicine (Baltimore). December 2019; 98(49): :e18106. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 23 January 2022.
