Difference between revisions of "German collective guilt"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (→The Cologne case and its consequences: Revise text.) |
m (wikify Israel) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a psychological phenomenon, first identified by [[Carl Jung]] (1945), in which the German people feel a collective guilt (''Kollektivschuld'') for the atrocities committed by their fellow countrymen.<ref name="jung1945">{{REFjournal | + | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a psychological phenomenon, first identified by [[Carl Gustav Jung]] (1945), in which the German people feel a collective guilt (''Kollektivschuld'') for the atrocities committed by their fellow countrymen.<ref name="jung1945">{{REFjournal |
|last=Jung | |last=Jung | ||
|init=CG | |init=CG | ||
| − | |author-link=Carl Jung | + | |author-link=Carl Gustav Jung |
|url= | |url= | ||
|title=Nach der Katastrophe | |title=Nach der Katastrophe | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
When Germany's Basic Law (''Grundgesetz'') was drafted in 1949, the collective guilt appeared to be at work in the authors since the Basic Law was given a very strong human rights suite to offer protection against another Holocaust. | When Germany's Basic Law (''Grundgesetz'') was drafted in 1949, the collective guilt appeared to be at work in the authors since the Basic Law was given a very strong human rights suite to offer protection against another Holocaust. | ||
| − | Germany has long given military aid to Israel in expiation of its felt collective guilt.<ref>{{REFweb | + | Germany has long given military aid to [[Israel]] in expiation of its felt collective guilt.<ref>{{REFweb |
|url=https://jacobin.com/2020/11/postwar-west-germany-support-israel-whitewashing | |url=https://jacobin.com/2020/11/postwar-west-germany-support-israel-whitewashing | ||
|title=How Postwar West Germany Used Support for Israel to Whitewash Its Image | |title=How Postwar West Germany Used Support for Israel to Whitewash Its Image | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
|date=2020-11-24 | |date=2020-11-24 | ||
|accessdate=2023-12-11 | |accessdate=2023-12-11 | ||
| − | }}</ref> Israel announced in 2023, that it is to receive advanced new Drakon-class submarines from Germany.<ref>{{REFweb | + | }}</ref> [[Israel]] announced in 2023, that it is to receive advanced new Drakon-class submarines from Germany.<ref>{{REFweb |
|url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/new-israeli-submarines-big-sail-seen-in-images | |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/new-israeli-submarines-big-sail-seen-in-images | ||
|title=Latest Israeli Submarine’s Big Sail Seen In New Images | |title=Latest Israeli Submarine’s Big Sail Seen In New Images | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|date=2023-08-03 | |date=2023-08-03 | ||
|accessdate=2023-12-11 | |accessdate=2023-12-11 | ||
| − | }}</ref> Today, it is Germany's national interest to fundamentally support Israel's security in the conflict with their neighbors, even though the German government still considers a two-state solution to be the preferable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.<ref>{{REFweb | + | }}</ref> Today, it is Germany's national interest to fundamentally support [[Israel]]'s security in the conflict with their neighbors, even though the German government still considers a two-state solution to be the preferable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.<ref>{{REFweb |
|url=https://www.rnd.de/politik/israels-sicherheit-ist-deutsche-staatsraeson-was-heisst-das-eigentlich-6ZIZKBHGEZCO3J4GIOLIK4LWWA.html | |url=https://www.rnd.de/politik/israels-sicherheit-ist-deutsche-staatsraeson-was-heisst-das-eigentlich-6ZIZKBHGEZCO3J4GIOLIK4LWWA.html | ||
|title=Israels Sicherheit ist deutsche Staatsräson – was heißt das eigentlich? | |title=Israels Sicherheit ist deutsche Staatsräson – was heißt das eigentlich? | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
|accessdate=2023-12-11 | |accessdate=2023-12-11 | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
| − | }}</ref> and Jews in Israel,<ref>{{REFnews | + | }}</ref> and Jews in [[Israel]],<ref>{{REFnews |
|title=Outraged German Jews slam court for prohibiting circumcision | |title=Outraged German Jews slam court for prohibiting circumcision | ||
|url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/german-jews-slam-court-for-ruling-prohibiting-circumcisions/ | |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/german-jews-slam-court-for-ruling-prohibiting-circumcisions/ | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
}}</ref> who sought to deny to boys the protections enacted by those guilt-feeling individuals who wanted to prevent a future recurrence of a Holocaust. | }}</ref> who sought to deny to boys the protections enacted by those guilt-feeling individuals who wanted to prevent a future recurrence of a Holocaust. | ||
| − | + | With Germany paralyzed by its collective guilt, the Israeli Knesset, without resistance by Germany, chose to inject itself into German internal affairs and demanded that Germany pass a law to protect [[Brit Milahcircumcision]],<ref>{{REFnews | |
|title='Germany must pass law to protect circumcision | |title='Germany must pass law to protect circumcision | ||
|url=https://www.jpost.com/National-News/Germany-must-pass-law-to-protect-circumcision | |url=https://www.jpost.com/National-News/Germany-must-pass-law-to-protect-circumcision | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
|website= | |website= | ||
|date=2012-06-27 | |date=2012-06-27 | ||
| − | |||
|accessdate=2023-12-11 | |accessdate=2023-12-11 | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
| Line 132: | Line 131: | ||
|format= | |format= | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
| − | }}</ref> Although German [[intactivists]] presented significant opposition to the passage of this law, they could not overcome the effects of ''collective guilt'', so the circumcision law received overwhelming support in the Bundestag. The 2012 [[Circumcision Debate]] and the strong influence of “German collective guilt” on voting behavior are described and evaluated in the book “[[Komikernation Deutschland]]” [Comedian Nation Germany] by [[Ulf Dunkel]]. | + | }}</ref> Although German [[intactivists]] presented significant opposition to the passage of this law, they could not overcome the effects of ''collective guilt'', so the circumcision law received overwhelming support in the Bundestag. |
| + | |||
| + | The 2012 [[Circumcision Debate]] and the strong influence of “German collective guilt” on voting behavior are described and evaluated in the book “[[Komikernation Deutschland]]” [Comedian Nation Germany] by [[Ulf Dunkel]]. | ||
Passage of legislation to protect the [[physical integrity]] and [[human rights]] of boys apparently will require overcoming the collective guilt. | Passage of legislation to protect the [[physical integrity]] and [[human rights]] of boys apparently will require overcoming the collective guilt. | ||
Latest revision as of 08:52, 25 March 2024
German collective guilt is a psychological phenomenon, first identified by Carl Gustav Jung (1945), in which the German people feel a collective guilt (Kollektivschuld) for the atrocities committed by their fellow countrymen.[1]
The source of the perceived collective guilt is the Holocaust that occurred during the dictatorship of Adolf Hitler that occurred from 1933 through 1945 in which about 6,000,000 Jews were killed.[2]
Most living Germans had not yet been born, so they cannot have any personal responsibility for the Holocaust, nevertheless the collective grief continues to be felt and it influences governmental behavior.
When Germany's Basic Law (Grundgesetz) was drafted in 1949, the collective guilt appeared to be at work in the authors since the Basic Law was given a very strong human rights suite to offer protection against another Holocaust.
Germany has long given military aid to Israel in expiation of its felt collective guilt.[3] Israel announced in 2023, that it is to receive advanced new Drakon-class submarines from Germany.[4] Today, it is Germany's national interest to fundamentally support Israel's security in the conflict with their neighbors, even though the German government still considers a two-state solution to be the preferable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.[5]
The Cologne case and its consequences
The Cologne circumcision court judgment by the Cologne regional court (Landgericht Köln) in which the court rightfully decided that a circumcision of a four-year-old boy of Muslim parents was a violation of the human rights provisions of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz), threatened to make all future non-therapeutic circumcisions of boys unlawful, unleashed overwhelming criticism by Muslims and Jews in Germany,[6] and Jews in Israel,[7] who sought to deny to boys the protections enacted by those guilt-feeling individuals who wanted to prevent a future recurrence of a Holocaust.
With Germany paralyzed by its collective guilt, the Israeli Knesset, without resistance by Germany, chose to inject itself into German internal affairs and demanded that Germany pass a law to protect Brit Milahcircumcision,[8] although the Basic Law prohibits such actions.
The Merkel government, apparently under the influence of the prevailing German collective guilt, said "we're taking circumcision issue very seriously", although that action would require violating the protected rights supposedly guaranteed by the Basic Law.[9] Although it defies common sense, apparently the collective guilt felt by the members of the Bundestag caused the members to pass the German Circumcision Act on 12 December 2012 in apparent violation of the Basic Law.[10][11] Although German intactivists presented significant opposition to the passage of this law, they could not overcome the effects of collective guilt, so the circumcision law received overwhelming support in the Bundestag.
The 2012 Circumcision Debate and the strong influence of “German collective guilt” on voting behavior are described and evaluated in the book “Komikernation Deutschland” [Comedian Nation Germany] by Ulf Dunkel.
Passage of legislation to protect the physical integrity and human rights of boys apparently will require overcoming the collective guilt.
External links
German collective guilt
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
References
- ↑
Jung CG. Nach der Katastrophe. Neue Schweizer Rundschau (Zurich). 1945; XIII: 67-88. Retrieved 10 December 2023.
- ↑
How Many People did the Nazis Murder?
, Holocaust Encyclopedia, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Retrieved 11 December 2023. - ↑ Marweki, Daniel (24 November 2020).
How Postwar West Germany Used Support for Israel to Whitewash Its Image
, Jacobin. Retrieved 11 December 2023. - ↑ Smutney, Matus (3 August 2023).
Latest Israeli Submarine’s Big Sail Seen In New Images
, The War Zone. Retrieved 11 December 2023. - ↑ Speer, Moritz (30 October 2023).
Israels Sicherheit ist deutsche Staatsräson – was heißt das eigentlich?
[Israel’s security is Germany's national interest – what does that actually mean?], RedaktionsNetzwerk Deutschland. Retrieved 11 December 2023. - ↑
Anonymous (12 July 2012)."Muslim and Jewish groups denounce German circumcision ruling", BBC. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ↑ Ahren, Raphael (26 June 2012)."Outraged German Jews slam court for prohibiting circumcision", The Times of Israel. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ↑ Horkav, Lahav (27 June 2012)."'Germany must pass law to protect circumcision", Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ↑ Ahren, Raphael (26 August 2012)."Merkel: We’re taking circumcision issue very seriously", The Times of Israel. Retrieved 26 August 2023.
- ↑ Chambers, Madeline (12 December 2012)."Germany passes law to protect circumcision after outcry", Reuters. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ↑ Anonynous (23 January 2013)."Germany Passes Circumcision Law After Outcry", Impact Lab. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
