Google bias on circumcision: Difference between revisions

Create page.
 
m Revise text.
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Construction Site}}
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is evident when one runs searches at Google regarding [[circumcision]]. A search for "circumcision information for parents" produced a list of about 230 promotional pages produced by various institutional and individual vendors of circumcision who profit from the performance of [[circumcision]], so are highly biased. No pages by opponents of circumcision such as [[Intact America]], [[Saving Our Sons]], or [[IntactiWiki]] were provided.
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is evident when one runs searches at Google regarding circumcision.


Separate searches for those named organizations did produce a link to their webpage but one has to type in their exact name to see it.


Other searches for circumcision, will produce known biased sources such as [[Wikipedia bias on circumcision| Wikipedia]], the [[Care_of_intact,_foreskinned_boys#Mayo_Clinic_information_should_be_rejected| Mayo Clinic]], and [[Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health]]. The IntactiWiki page, ''[[Circumcision bullet-points for parents]]'', can only be found if the title of the page is enclosed in quotation marks.


Alternative search engines may produce more balanced results than Google.
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Wikipedia bias on circumcision]]
* [[Wikipedia bias on circumcision]]
Line 10: Line 12:
{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}
* {{URLwebsite|https://www.google.com|2024-09-02}}
* {{URLwebsite|https://www.google.com|2024-09-02}}
[[Category:Bias]]
[[Category:Database]]
[[Category:Parental information]]