Difference between revisions of "E. Harding Freeland"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "This quote alludes the desensitization of the glans in absence of the protection of the foreskin. {{Citation | Title= | Text=It has been urged as an argument against the...")
 
(Add category; Add SEEALSO section.)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This quote alludes the desensitization of the glans in absence of the protection of the [[foreskin]].
+
'''Ernest Harding Freeland''' was a surgeon to the St. George's and St. James's Dispensary, London.
 +
 
 +
This quote alludes the desensitization of the [[glans]] in absence of the protection of the [[foreskin]].
  
 
{{Citation
 
{{Citation
| Title=
+
|Title=
| Text=It has been urged as an argument against the universal adoption of circumcision that the removal of the protective covering of the glans tends to dull the sensitivity of that exquisitly sensitive structure and thereby diminishes sexual appetite and the pleasurable effects of coitus. Granted that this be true, my answer is that, whatever may have been the case in days gone by, sensuality in our time needs neither whip nor spur, but would be all the better for a little more judicious use of curb and bearing-rein.
+
|Text=It has been urged as an argument against the universal adoption of circumcision that the removal of the protective covering of the glans tends to dull the sensitivity of that exquisitly sensitive structure and thereby diminishes sexual appetite and the pleasurable effects of coitus. Granted that this be true, my answer is that, whatever may have been the case in days gone by, sensuality in our time needs neither whip nor spur, but would be all the better for a little more judicious use of curb and bearing-rein.
| Author=E. Harding Freeland
+
|Author=E. Harding Freeland
| Source=
+
|Source=
| lang=
+
|ref=<ref>{{REFjournal
| before=
+
  |last=Freeland
| after=
+
  |first=E. Harding
| Transcription=
+
  |author-link=E. Harding Freeland
| Translation=
+
|init=EH
| ref=<ref>{{REFjournal
+
  |title=Circumcision as a Preventative of Syphilis and Other Disorders
  | last=Freeland
+
  |journal=The Lancet
  | first=E. Harding
+
  |volume=2
  | coauthors=
+
  |issue=
  | title=Circumcision as a Preventative of Syphilis and Other Disorders
+
  |pages=1869-1871
  | journal=The Lancet
+
  |url=
  | volume=2
+
  |quote=
  | issue=
+
  |pubmedID=
  | pages=1869-1871
+
  |pubmedCID=
  | url=
+
  |DOI=
  | quote=
+
  |date=1900-12-29
  | pubmedID=
+
  |accessdate=
  | pubmedCID=
 
  | DOI=
 
  | date=29 Dec. 1900
 
  | accessdate=
 
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
 
}}
 
}}
 +
{{SEEALSO}}
 +
* [[United Kingdom]]
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
  
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Freeland, E. Harding}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Freeland, E. Harding}}
  
[[Category:People]]
+
[[Category:Person]]
[[Category:Victorian Doctors]]
+
[[Category:Male]]
[[Category:CircLeaks]]
+
[[Category:Deceased]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Physician]]
 +
[[Category:Surgeon]]
 +
[[Category:Victorian doctor]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:UK]]
  
 +
[[Category:From CircLeaks]]
 
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
 
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
 +
 +
[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]]

Latest revision as of 23:15, 30 October 2022

Ernest Harding Freeland was a surgeon to the St. George's and St. James's Dispensary, London.

This quote alludes the desensitization of the glans in absence of the protection of the foreskin.

It has been urged as an argument against the universal adoption of circumcision that the removal of the protective covering of the glans tends to dull the sensitivity of that exquisitly sensitive structure and thereby diminishes sexual appetite and the pleasurable effects of coitus. Granted that this be true, my answer is that, whatever may have been the case in days gone by, sensuality in our time needs neither whip nor spur, but would be all the better for a little more judicious use of curb and bearing-rein.
– E. Harding Freeland[1]

See also

References

  1. REFjournal Freeland EH. Circumcision as a Preventative of Syphilis and Other Disorders. The Lancet. 29 December 1900; 2: 1869-1871.