Aposthia: Difference between revisions

m Wikify foreskin; fix link to Dorland's.
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m adjusted REFjournal
Line 2: Line 2:


Toward the end of the nineteenth century, E. S. Talbot claimed in ''Medicine'' that aposthia among Jews was evidence for the now-discredited Lamarckian theory of evolution.<ref>{{REFjournal
Toward the end of the nineteenth century, E. S. Talbot claimed in ''Medicine'' that aposthia among Jews was evidence for the now-discredited Lamarckian theory of evolution.<ref>{{REFjournal
|first=E.S.
  |last=Talbot
  |last=Talbot
|init=ES
  |title=Inheritance of circumcision effects
  |title=Inheritance of circumcision effects
  |journal=Medicine
  |journal=Medicine
Line 48: Line 48:
* {{REFjournal
* {{REFjournal
  |last=Amin-Ud-Din
  |last=Amin-Ud-Din
  |first=M.
  |init=M
  |last2=Salam
  |last2=Salam
  |first2=A.
  |init2=A
  |last3=Rafiq
  |last3=Rafiq
  |first3=M.A.
  |init3=MA
  |last4=Khaliq
  |last4=Khaliq
  |first4=I.
  |init4=I
  |last5=Ansar
  |last5=Ansar
  |first5=M.
  |init5=M
  |last6=Ahmad
  |last6=Ahmad
  |first6=W.
  |init6=W
  |url=http://www.emro.who.int/Publications/emhj/1302/article7.htm
  |url=http://www.emro.who.int/Publications/emhj/1302/article7.htm
  |title=Aposthia: a birth defect or normal quantitative recessive human genetic trait?
  |title=Aposthia: a birth defect or normal quantitative recessive human genetic trait?