Boldt v. Boldt: Difference between revisions

m Add author link.
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Construction Site}}
{{Construction Site}}
'''Boldt v. Boldt''' is formally a child custody case from the state of Oregon, however it actually is about the proposed circumcision of a boy.
'''Boldt v. Boldt''' is formally a child custody case from the state of Oregon, however it actually is about the proposed circumcision of a boy.


Line 6: Line 5:


[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] filed two amicus curiae briefs in this case and was successful in protecting the boy's [[foreskin]] from [[circumcision]].
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] filed two amicus curiae briefs in this case and was successful in protecting the boy's [[foreskin]] from [[circumcision]].


{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}
* {{REFweb
* {{REFweb
  |url=http://www.circinfo.org/Boldt_case.html
  |url=http://www.circinfo.org/Boldt_case.html
Line 17: Line 14:
  |accessdate=2020-04-18
  |accessdate=2020-04-18
}}
}}
* {{REFnews
* {{REFnews
  |title=Ask boy, 12, if he wants to be circumcised, court says
  |title=Ask boy, 12, if he wants to be circumcised, court says
Line 30: Line 26:
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}
}}
* {{REFjournal
* {{REFjournal
  |last=Diekema
  |last=Diekema
Line 53: Line 48:
  |accessdate=2020-04-19
  |accessdate=2020-04-19
}}
}}
* {{REFjournal
* {{REFjournal
  |last=Geisheker
  |last=Geisheker
Line 76: Line 70:
  |accessdate=2020-04-19
  |accessdate=2020-04-19
}}
}}
* {{REFdocument
* {{REFdocument
  |title=Boldt and Boldt, (CC No. 98-2318-D(3); CA A126175; SC S054714)
  |title=Boldt and Boldt, (CC No. 98-2318-D(3); CA A126175; SC S054714)
Line 89: Line 82:
}}
}}


[[Category:USA]]
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
[[Category:Jurisprudence]]
[[Category:Jurisprudence]]
[[Category:Construction Site]]
[[Category:USA]]
 
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]