IntactiWiki

Position statements on infant circumcision: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats
22,152 edits
→American Academy of Pediatrics: Change title, improve quotation.
Line 111: Line 111:
  |url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/commentary-on-american-academy-of-pediatrics-2012-circumcision-policy-statement.pdf
  |url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/commentary-on-american-academy-of-pediatrics-2012-circumcision-policy-statement.pdf
  |archived=
  |archived=
  |title=Medical Organization Statements
  |title=Commentary on American Academy of Pediatrics2012 Circumcision Policy Statement
  |trans-title=
  |trans-title=
  |language=English
  |language=English
Line 122: Line 122:
  |accessdate=2020-06-28
  |accessdate=2020-06-28
  |format=
  |format=
  |quote=To increase the income of their members (whom the AAP calls ‘fellows’), these medical associations are willing to put healthy American boys under the circumcision knife and expose them all to the risks of any surgery, and the unique risks, harms, and losses of circumcision itself.
  |quote=The 2012 Circumcision Policy Statement was created by a team put together for the specific purpose of protecting the goose that lays golden eggs for the American medical industry. None of the members had any specific expertise in circumcision and their document suggests they knew little or nothing about the anatomy and utility of the human foreskin. They claimed to have studied voluminous literature, but ignored older and more useful studies, and cherry-picked the medical oeuvre.
}}</ref> an association of European doctors,<ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref> an association of European doctors,<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Frisch
  |last=Frisch
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Position_statements_on_infant_circumcision"