Infant Circumcision is Unnecessary: Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
created
 
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m wikify Israel
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Citation
{{Citation
  |Title=Infant and child [[circumcision]] is unnecessary. There are no good reasons to subject any child to genital mutilation.
  |Title=Infant and child [[circumcision]] is unnecessary. There are no good reasons to subject any child to genital mutilation.
  |Text=Circumcision of babies and children is forced genital mutilation, without any medical validity. It harms children and does not benefit them in any way. It is the US and Israel where this outdated [[human rights]] violation persists. However, more American parents are becoming better informed, and are protecting their baby boys. Boys are not born broken!
  |Text=Circumcision of babies and children is forced genital mutilation, without any medical validity. It harms children and does not benefit them in any way. It is the US and [[Israel]] where this outdated [[human rights]] violation persists. However, more American parents are becoming better informed, and are protecting their baby boys. Boys are not born broken!
  |Author={{FULLPAGENAME}}
  |Author={{FULLPAGENAME}}
}}
}}

Revision as of 07:50, 25 March 2024

Infant Circumcision is Unnecessary is a Facebook intactivists page, obviously driven by some US Americans.

Claim

Infant and child circumcision is unnecessary. There are no good reasons to subject any child to genital mutilation.
Circumcision of babies and children is forced genital mutilation, without any medical validity. It harms children and does not benefit them in any way. It is the US and Israel where this outdated human rights violation persists. However, more American parents are becoming better informed, and are protecting their baby boys. Boys are not born broken!
– Infant Circumcision is Unnecessary