Difference between revisions of "Urethral injury"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (→Case report: Add surgical repair section.) |
m (adjust REFs, wikify terms) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/kaplan/#n62 | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/kaplan/#n62 | ||
|accessdate=2022-03-05 | |accessdate=2022-03-05 | ||
| − | }}</ref> <ref name="williams1993">{{REFjournal | + | }}</ref><ref name="williams1993">{{REFjournal |
|last=Williams | |last=Williams | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|last2=Kapilla | |last2=Kapilla | ||
|first2=Leela | |first2=Leela | ||
| + | |init2=L | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Complications of circumcision | |title=Complications of circumcision | ||
| Line 36: | Line 37: | ||
|DOI=10.1002/bjs.1800801005 | |DOI=10.1002/bjs.1800801005 | ||
|accessdate=2022-03-05 | |accessdate=2022-03-05 | ||
| − | }}</ref> <ref name="krill2011">{{REFjournal | + | }}</ref><ref name="krill2011">{{REFjournal |
|last=Krill | |last=Krill | ||
|first=Aaron J. | |first=Aaron J. | ||
| − | |init= | + | |init=AJ |
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
|last2=Palmer | |last2=Palmer | ||
|first2=Lane S. | |first2=Lane S. | ||
| − | |init2= | + | |init2=LS |
|author2-link= | |author2-link= | ||
|last3=Palmer | |last3=Palmer | ||
|first3=Jeffrey S. | |first3=Jeffrey S. | ||
| − | |init3= | + | |init3=JS |
|author3-link= | |author3-link= | ||
|etal= | |etal= | ||
|title=Complications of circumcision | |title=Complications of circumcision | ||
| − | + | |journal=ScientificWorldJournal | |
| − | |||
| − | |journal= ScientificWorldJournal | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
|date=2011-12-26 | |date=2011-12-26 | ||
| Line 73: | Line 72: | ||
==Case report== | ==Case report== | ||
| − | Limaye & Hancock (1968) reported the case of a seven-year-old caucasian boy who presented with a supposed case of "hypospadias". The boy had been circumcised on the third day of life. Upon examination the supposed "hypospadias" was discovered to be urethral fistula, sufficiently large to allow the passage of probe into the meatus and out through the fistula. A surgical repair was successful.<ref name=limaye1968">{{REFjournal | + | Limaye & Hancock (1968) reported the case of a seven-year-old caucasian boy who presented with a supposed case of "[[hypospadias]]". The boy had been circumcised on the third day of life. Upon examination the supposed "[[hypospadias]]" was discovered to be [[urethral fistula]], sufficiently large to allow the passage of probe into the meatus and out through the fistula. A surgical repair was successful.<ref name=limaye1968">{{REFjournal |
|last=Limaye | |last=Limaye | ||
|first=Ramesh D. | |first=Ramesh D. | ||
| − | |init= | + | |init=RD |
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
|last2=Hancock | |last2=Hancock | ||
|first2=Reginald A. | |first2=Reginald A. | ||
| − | |init2= | + | |init2=RA |
|author2-link= | |author2-link= | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Penile urethral fistula as a complication of circumcision | |title=Penile urethral fistula as a complication of circumcision | ||
| − | + | |journal=J Pediatr | |
| − | |||
| − | |journal=J | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
|date=1989 | |date=1989 | ||
| Line 107: | Line 101: | ||
==Surgical repair== | ==Surgical repair== | ||
| − | Baskin et al. (1997) discussed methods of surgical repair. | + | Baskin et al. (1997) discussed methods of surgical repair.<ref>{{REFjournal |
| − | <ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Baskin | |last=Baskin | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 121: | Line 114: | ||
|init3=HM | |init3=HM | ||
|author3-link= | |author3-link= | ||
| − | |last4=Duckett | + | |last4=Duckett Jr. |
|first4= | |first4= | ||
|init4=JW | |init4=JW | ||
| Line 127: | Line 120: | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=Surgical repair of urethral circumcision injuries | |title=Surgical repair of urethral circumcision injuries | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|journal=J Urol | |journal=J Urol | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
Revision as of 09:02, 7 March 2022
Urethral injury is a well-recognized and documented complication of circumcision.[1][2][3]
Urethrocutaneous fistula is the most common type of urethral injury.
Case report
Limaye & Hancock (1968) reported the case of a seven-year-old caucasian boy who presented with a supposed case of "hypospadias". The boy had been circumcised on the third day of life. Upon examination the supposed "hypospadias" was discovered to be urethral fistula, sufficiently large to allow the passage of probe into the meatus and out through the fistula. A surgical repair was successful.[4]
Surgical repair
Baskin et al. (1997) discussed methods of surgical repair.[5]
References
- ↑
Kaplan GW. Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin N Amer. 1983; 10(08): 543-9. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
- ↑ Williams N, Kapilla L. Complications of circumcision. Brit J Surg. October 1993; 80(10): 1231-6. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
- ↑ Krill AJ, Palmer LS, Palmer JS. Complications of circumcision. ScientificWorldJournal. 26 December 2011; 11: 2458-68. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
- ↑ Limaye RD, Hancock RA. Penile urethral fistula as a complication of circumcision. J Pediatr. 1989; 72(1): 105-6. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
- ↑ Baskin LS, Canning DA, Snyder HM, Duckett Jr. JW. Surgical repair of urethral circumcision injuries. J Urol. December 1997; 158(6): 2269-71. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 27 January 2022.
