Circumcised: Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Revise text; Add categories.
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Circumcised''' is an adjective applied to the incomplete [[penis]] which has had an essential, functional part excised, resulting in a condition of male genital mutilation ([[MGM]]).
'''Circumcised''' is an adjective applied to the incomplete [[penis]] and to males with an incomplete penis, which has had an essential, functional part (the [[foreskin]]) excised, resulting in a condition of male genital mutilation ([[MGM]]).


Family Court Judge Sir James Munby ruled in the case of [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3| B & G]] that excision of the functional [[prepuce]] of the circumcised penis constituted "significant harm''.<ref>Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]</ref>
''Circumcised'' is a Biblical term. It occurs many times in tbe Holy Bible. The first occurrence is in Genesis 17:10. It also is used as a noun to refer to the Hebrews.
 
Family Court Judge Sir James Munby ruled in the case of [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3| B & G]] that excision of the functional [[foreskin]] of the penis constituted "significant harm''.<ref>Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]</ref>


{{REF}}
{{REF}}
Line 8: Line 10:
[[Category:Circumcision term]]
[[Category:Circumcision term]]
[[Category:Foreskin anatomy]]
[[Category:Foreskin anatomy]]
[[Category:Body modification]]
[[Category:Genital mutilation]]
[[Category:Religion]]

Revision as of 10:12, 10 June 2022

Circumcised is an adjective applied to the incomplete penis and to males with an incomplete penis, which has had an essential, functional part (the foreskin) excised, resulting in a condition of male genital mutilation (MGM).

Circumcised is a Biblical term. It occurs many times in tbe Holy Bible. The first occurrence is in Genesis 17:10. It also is used as a noun to refer to the Hebrews.

Family Court Judge Sir James Munby ruled in the case of B & G that excision of the functional foreskin of the penis constituted "significant harm.[1]

References

  1. Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]