Preputioplasty: Difference between revisions

Add link in SEEALSO section.
Add external link.
Line 392: Line 392:
  |DOI=10.21037/gs.2018.02.04  
  |DOI=10.21037/gs.2018.02.04  
  |accessdate=2023-01-11
  |accessdate=2023-01-11
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Balaji 
|first=
|init=BS
|author-link=
|last2=Jacob 
|first2=
|init2=TJK
|author2-link=
|last3=Gowri 
|first3=
|init3=MS
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|title=Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Family Med Prim Care
|location=
|date=2020-05-31
|season=
|volume=9
|issue=5
|article=
|page=
|pages=2297-302
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380800/
|archived=
|quote= The surgical morbidity and cosmetic outcomes of prepuce preservation techniques result in high satisfaction from parents in communities’ not practicing religious circumcision.
|pubmedID=32754491
|pubmedCID=7380800
|DOI=10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_49_20
|accessdate=2023-02-11
}}
}}
{{REF}}
{{REF}}