Protection of intact newborns in hospital: Difference between revisions

Create page.
 
Add text and citation.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Construction Site}}
{{Construction Site}}
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is an important but frequently overlooked parental duty for parents of a newborn [[intact]] boy in an American maternity hospital. Non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of newborn boys remains a common practice despite its unethical nature. Circumcision is a profit center for hospitals, so many will promote circumcision in various ways. It is easy for nursery attendant to make a mistake and bring an intact boy for an unwanted circumcision.
'''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is an important but frequently overlooked parental duty for parents of a newborn [[intact]] boy in an American maternity hospital. Non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of newborn boys remains a common practice despite its unethical nature. Circumcision is a profit center for hospitals, so many will promote circumcision in various ways. It is easy for nursery attendant to make a mistake and bring an intact boy for an unwanted circumcision. Mansfield et al. (1995) report when a newborn is to be [[circumcised]], both mother and newborn remain in hospital an average of six hours longer which substantially increases revenue to the hospital,<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Mansfield
|first=
|init=CJ
|author-link=
|last2=Heuston
|first2=
|init2=WF
|author2-link=
|last3=Rudy
|first3=
|init3=M
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|title=Neonatal circumcision: associated factors and length of hospital stay
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Fam Pract
|location=
|date=1995-10
|volume=41
|issue=4
|article=
|pages=370-6
|url=https://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/mansfield/
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=7561711
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|accessdate=2023-05-22
}}</ref> so hospitals encourage and promote circumcision regardless of the [[pain]], [[trauma]], and loss of tissue and function.


{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}