EMLA: Difference between revisions

History: Add text and citation.
Line 36: Line 36:


== History ==
== History ==
Before the specification of the approval in 2013, EMLA ointment was often used in the so-called ''off-label use''<ref>{{REFweb
Lander et al. (1997) did a comparison study of EMLA® cream topical anesthetic.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Emla+cream
|title=Emla cream
|last=Anonymous
|publisher=The Free Dictionary by Farley
|date=2005
|accessdate=2023-11-24
}}</ref> EMLA® was the least-effective of the three analgesia methods studied.<ref name="lander1997">{{REFjournal
|last=Lander
|init=J
|first=Janice
|author-link=
|last2=Brady-Frerer
|init2=B
|first2=Barbara
|author2-link=
|last3=Metcalfe
|init3=JB
|first3=James B.
|author3-link=
|last4=Nazerali
|init4=S
|first4=Shermin
|author4-link=
|last5=Muttit
|init5=S
|first5=Sarah
|author5-link=
|etal=no
|title= Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision
|journal=JAMA
|location=
|date=1997-12-24
|volume=278
|issue=24
|pages=2157-64
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/lander/
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=9417009
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|accessdate=2023-12-01
}}</ref>
 
Before the specification of the approval in 2013, EMLA® ointment was often used in the so-called ''off-label use''<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-label_use
  |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-label_use
  |title=Off-Label use
  |title=Off-Label use
  |website=Wikipedia
  |website=Wikipedia
  |accessdate=2022-07-27
  |accessdate=2022-07-27
}}</ref> in neonatal circumcision. In addition, EMLA ointment does not require a prescription and can therefore be purchased over the counter. As a result, a medical risk assessment for off-label use is not guaranteed. Even less can it be assumed that the partly non-physician group of people who use EMLA® ointment for newborn circumcision recognizes the symptoms of toxic drug levels in the newborn, let alone masters them.<ref name="Wakankar 2014-02-18">{{REFweb
}}</ref> in neonatal circumcision. In addition, EMLA® ointment does not require a prescription and can therefore be purchased over the counter. As a result, a medical risk assessment for off-label use is not guaranteed. Even less can it be assumed that the partly non-physician group of people who use EMLA® ointment for newborn circumcision recognizes the symptoms of toxic drug levels in the newborn, let alone masters them.<ref name="Wakankar 2014-02-18">{{REFweb
  |url=https://www.beschneidungsforum.de/thread/2353-buchver%C3%B6ffentlichung-mit-einem-beitrag-von-j%C3%A9r%C3%B4me-segal-herausgeber-prof-matthia/?postID=27504#post27504
  |url=https://www.beschneidungsforum.de/thread/2353-buchver%C3%B6ffentlichung-mit-einem-beitrag-von-j%C3%A9r%C3%B4me-segal-herausgeber-prof-matthia/?postID=27504#post27504
  |title=Die Beschneidung von Jungen, ein trauriges Vermächtnis
  |title=Die Beschneidung von Jungen, ein trauriges Vermächtnis