Redundant foreskin: Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Add text and citation.
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Redundant foreskin''' (aka '''Insufficient foreskin removal''') is classed technically as a [[complication]]. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected [[circumcised]] appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal
'''Redundant foreskin''' (aka '''Insufficient foreskin removal''') is classed technically as a [[complication]] of elective [[circumcision]]. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected [[circumcised]] appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision may be usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Fekete
  |last=Fekete
  |first=Ferenc
  |first=Ferenc

Revision as of 13:27, 13 July 2024

Redundant foreskin (aka Insufficient foreskin removal) is classed technically as a complication of elective circumcision. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision may be usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]

There is no accepted definition of redundant foreskin.

Acroposthion

A longer foreskin that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an acroposthion, that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.[2]


See also

References