Third-party payment in the United States: Difference between revisions

Line 155: Line 155:
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
* [[Australia]]
* The [https://auspaediatrics.org.au/ Australian Pædiatric Association] resolved in 1971 "that newborn male infants should not, as a routine, be circumcised." That remains the position of medical science today. Public hospitals of the several states of [[Australia]] do not permit the performance of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]].<ref name="tanny2015">{{REFjournal
|last=Na
|first=
|init=AF
|author-link=
|last2=Tanny
|first2=
|init2=SPT
|author2-link=
|last3=Hutson
|first3=
|init3=JM
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision: Is it worth it for 21st-century Australian boys?
|language=
|journal= J Paediatr Child Health
|location=
|date=2015-06
|volume=51
|issue=6
|article=
|page=
|pages=580-3
|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jpc.12825
|archived=
|quote=Most Australian states withdrew circumcision from the range of free services provided in public hospitals through Medicare funding system.
|pubmedID=25683279
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1111/jpc.12825
|accessdate=2025-01-18
}}</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Financial Incentive]]
* [[Financial Incentive]]