IntactiWiki

Third-party payment in the United States: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats
22,151 edits
Line 155: Line 155:
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
* The [https://auspaediatrics.org.au/ Australian Pædiatric Association] resolved in 1971 "that newborn male infants should not, as a routine, be circumcised." That remains the position of medical science today. Public hospitals of the several states of [[Australia]] do not permit the performance of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]].<ref name="tanny2015">{{REFjournal
* The [https://auspaediatrics.org.au/ Australian Pædiatric Association] resolved in 1971 "that newborn male infants should not, as a routine, be circumcised."<ref name="bellmaine1971">{{REFjournal
|last=Bellmaine
|init=SP
|title=Circumcision
|journal=Medical Journal of Australia
|date=1971-05-22
|volume=1
|pages=1148
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/apa1971/
|accessdate=2025-01-18
}}</ref> That remains the position of medical science today. Public hospitals of the several states of [[Australia]] do not permit the performance of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]].<ref name="tanny2015">{{REFjournal
  |last=Na
  |last=Na
  |first=
  |first=
Line 186: Line 196:
  |DOI=10.1111/jpc.12825
  |DOI=10.1111/jpc.12825
  |accessdate=2025-01-18
  |accessdate=2025-01-18
}}</ref>
}}</ref> [[Circumcision Information Australia]] (2020) called non-therapeutic circumcision in Australia "now pretty much a thing of the past."<ref>{{REFweb
|url=http://www.circinfo.org/index.php
|title=Circumcision in Australia
|accessdate=2025-01-18
}} </ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Financial Incentive]]
* [[Financial Incentive]]
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Third-party_payment_in_the_United_States"