Arguments pro circumcision: Difference between revisions
→Trivializing arguments: I've never heard anyone complain about being circumcised. |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* '''"[[Circumcision]] is similar to removing a patch."''' | * '''"[[Circumcision]] is similar to removing a patch."''' | ||
*: All published circumcision videos show that those who are circumcised without adequate anaesthetic treatment (anaesthesia or anaesthetic), suffer immense pain. Infants fall regularly in shock as a reaction to the pain, when being circumcised without effective anaestesia. | *: All published [[It´s A Boy!|circumcision videos]] show that those who are circumcised without adequate anaesthetic treatment (anaesthesia or anaesthetic), suffer immense pain. Infants fall regularly in shock as a reaction to the pain, when being circumcised without effective anaestesia. | ||
* '''"Babies feel no pain yet, therefore should be circumcised at an early stage."''' | * '''"Babies feel no pain yet, therefore should be circumcised at an early stage."''' | ||
*: This assertion is completely obsolete and refuted in many studies. In the mother's womb, children already feel pain, and even more directly after birth. | *: This assertion is completely obsolete and refuted in many studies. In the mother's womb, children already feel pain, and even more directly after birth. | ||
* '''"Circumcision is comparable with ear piercing or other piercings."''' | * '''"[[Circumcision]]is comparable with ear piercing or other piercings."''' | ||
*: Usually any sensitive tissue or even functional body parts remove earlobes and piercings. Also earlobes and piercing holes can grow again. Therefore, this comparison is completely untenable. | *: Usually any sensitive tissue or even functional body parts remove earlobes and piercings. Also earlobes and piercing holes can grow again. Therefore, this comparison is completely untenable. | ||