Development of retractable foreskin: Difference between revisions

Line 328: Line 328:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Male circumcision is outmoded as a treatment for non-retractile foreskin, but it is still recommended by many urologists because of lack of adequate information, and perhaps because of the fees associated with circumcision. Nevertheless, circumcision should be avoided because of pain, trauma, cost,<ref name="Van Howe">{{REFjournal
Male circumcision is outmoded as a treatment for non-retractile foreskin, but it is still recommended by many urologists because of lack of adequate information, and perhaps because of the profit to the doctor associated with circumcision. Nevertheless, circumcision should be avoided because of pain, trauma, cost,<ref name="Van Howe">{{REFjournal
  |last=Van Howe
  |last=Van Howe
  |first=RS
  |first=RS
Line 364: Line 364:
  |date=2001
  |date=2001
  |accessdate=
  |accessdate=
}}</ref>complications,<ref name="Van Howe"/> difficult recovery, permanent injury to the appearance of the penis, loss of pleasurable erogenous sensation,<ref>{{REFjournal
}}</ref> complications,<ref name="Van Howe"/> difficult recovery, permanent injury to the appearance of the penis, loss of pleasurable erogenous sensation,<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Williams
  |last=Williams
  |first=N.
  |first=N.