Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Foreskin restoration

215 bytes removed, 01:55, 29 September 2019
Insert external link. Delete false information from Jake Waskett et al.
| url=http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/
| title=The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision
| last=Taylor | first=JR
| publisher=
| work=
| date=May 2007
| accessdate=
}}</ref> while others have reported that it is more sensitive in uncircumcised males.<ref name="sorrels">{{REFjournal
| last=Sorrells
| first=
| date=April 2008
| accessdate=
}}</ref> (the interpretation of one of these studies is disputed<ref name="waskett2007">{{REFjournal | last=Waskett | first=Jake H. | coauthors=[[Brian J. Morris]] | title=Fine touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis | journal=BJU International | volume=99 | issue=6 | pages=1551-1552 | url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/118508593/HTMLSTART | quote= | pubmedID=17537227 | pubmedCID= | DOI=10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06970_6.x | date=May 2007 | accessdate=}}</ref>). It has been suggested that the perceived sensitivity gains of the glans reported by some men are psychological, with glans sensitivity itself being unaffected.<ref>{{REFweb
| quote=
| url=http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/309/6955/679/a
* [http://www.norm.org NORM - National Organization of Restoring Men (U.S.)]
* [http://www.cirp.org/pages/restore.html CIRP Foreskin restoration for circumcised males]
* {{REFweb
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/foreskin-restoration/
|title=Non-surgical foreskin restoration
|last=
|first=
|publisher=
|website=Doctors Opposing Circumcision
|date=2019-02
|accessdate=2019-09-28
|format=
|quote=
}}
* [http://www.norm-uk.org NORM-UK - National Organization of Restoring Men (UK)]
* [http://www.iomfats.org/resources/restoring/media/restoring_faq.pdf My responses to a few Frequently Asked Questions about Non-Surgical Foreskin Restoration], Roy M. Payne; Fryer, Leo (2001-03)
15,758
edits

Navigation menu