Pierre Crouse: Difference between revisions

"Virtually Painless": Wikify "Neil Pollock"
No edit summary
Line 253: Line 253:
==== What Crouse may not tell parents about Mogen ====
==== What Crouse may not tell parents about Mogen ====


Pollock and Crouse peddle the [[Mogen]] technique, but what they may not tell parents is that the Mogen clamp has been notorious for glans amputations, even among experienced conductors of circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal
Pollock and Crouse peddle the [[Mogen]] technique, but what they may not tell parents is that the Mogen clamp has been notorious for glans amputations, even among experienced conductors of circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal|last=Taeusch
|last=Taeusch
  |first=H. William
  |first=H. William
  |first2=Alma M.
  |first2=Alma M.
Line 272: Line 271:
  |pages=214-218
  |pages=214-218
  |url=http://www.nature.com/jp/journal/v22/n3/full/7210653a.html
  |url=http://www.nature.com/jp/journal/v22/n3/full/7210653a.html
  |quote=...approximately 10% of the glans of a newborn was amputated (it was reattached surgically) during a Mogen circumcision carried out by two of our most experienced physicians.
  |quote=...approximately 10% of the glans of a newborn was amputated (it was reattached surgically) during a Mogen circumcision carried out by two of our most experienced physicians.</ref>
|pubmedID=
Mogen went out of business<ref name="tagami2011">{{REFnews
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=
|date=2002-04
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> Mogen went out of business<ref>{{REFnews
  |last=Tagami
  |last=Tagami
  |first=Ty
  |first=Ty
Line 287: Line 281:
  |date=2010-07-19
  |date=2010-07-19
  |accessdate=2011-04-08
  |accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> after losing a 10.8 million dollar law suit,<ref>{{REFnews
}}</ref> after losing a 10.8 million dollar law suit,<ref name="tagami2011" /> after a ''mohel''<ref name="tagami2011" />
|last=Tagami
severed the end of a baby's glans <ref name="tagami2011" /> using one of their clamps. Mogen claimed that injury was impossible with its use.<ref name="tagami2011"/> The injury behind a prior lawsuit in [https://www.fultoncourt.org/ Fulton County Superior Court] had already put Mogen on notice about the danger of the device.<ref name="tagami2011"/> In a different case, at South Fulton Medical Center, another law suit was won in 2009.<ref name="tagami2011"/> In that case, a child lost a third of his glans, and the plaintiffs were awarded 2.3 million dollars.<ref name="tagami2011"/>
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=after an infant lost a portion of his penis during an operation with the Mogen clamp, a judge awarded $10.8 million in damages against the company.
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> after a mohel<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Tagami
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=In this case, a New York mohel, or Jewish ritual circumcisor, performed the operation in the baby's home
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> severed the end of a baby's glans<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Tagami
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=The baby in the current case, identified in court documents only as L.G., lost the entire glans, or head, of his penis ...
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> using one of their clamps. Mogen claimed that injury was impossible with its use.<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Tagami
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=The maker of an instrument used in circumcisions claimed that injury was impossible with its use...
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> The injury behind a prior lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court had already put Mogen on notice about the danger of the device.<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Tagami
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=Attorney David Llewellyn won a similar case in Atlanta last year and the injury behind that prior lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court put the New York clamp manufacturer on notice about the danger of the device...
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> In a different case, at South Fulton Medical Center, another law suit was won in 2009.<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Tagami
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=Llewellyn won another circumcision case in 2009 over an operation at South Fulton Medical Center.
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref> In that case, a child lost a third of his glans, and the plaintiffs were awarded 2.3 million dollars.<ref>{{REFnews
|last=Tagami
|first=Ty
|url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/atlanta-lawyer-wins-11-573890.html
|title=Atlanta lawyer wins $11 million lawsuit for family in botched circumcision
|publisher=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|quote=The jury found that both the pediatrician and the physician who performed the circumcision were negligent, and awarded $2.3 million to the plaintiffs.
|date=2010-07-19
|accessdate=2011-04-08
}}</ref>


{{REF}}
{{REF}}