Difference between revisions of "Brussels Collaboration on Bodily Integrity"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Revise text.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
}}</ref> The groups argues that [[Circumcision| male]], [[Female circumcision| female]], and [[intersex]] cutting must be considered together.<ref name="brussels2019" /> | }}</ref> The groups argues that [[Circumcision| male]], [[Female circumcision| female]], and [[intersex]] cutting must be considered together.<ref name="brussels2019" /> | ||
| − | Dr. Shimon Samuels, Director for International Relations for the Wiesenthal Center, in a letter to [[J. Steven Svoboda]] of [[Attorneys for the Rights of the Child]], expressed concern that the Brussels Collaboration threatened [[Abrahamic covenant]], now debunked by Professor [[Leonard Glick]] | + | Dr. Shimon Samuels, Director for International Relations for the Wiesenthal Center, in a letter to [[J. Steven Svoboda]] of [[Attorneys for the Rights of the Child]], expressed concern that the Brussels Collaboration threatened [[Abrahamic covenant]], now debunked by Professor [[Leonard Glick]],<ref>{{REFnews |
|title=Wiesenthal Center slams international campaign to ban circumcision | |title=Wiesenthal Center slams international campaign to ban circumcision | ||
|url=https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/279607 | |url=https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/279607 | ||
Revision as of 14:46, 6 August 2020
The Brussels Collaboration on Bodily Integrity is a collection of ninety-one mostly academic individuals of various nationalities who seek to advance the bodily integrity of children. The group describes itself:
We are physicians, ethicists, nurse-midwives, public health professionals, legal scholars, political scientists, anthropologists, psychologists, sociologists, philosophers, and feminists from Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, the Middle East, and the Americas with interdisciplinary expertise in child genital cutting practices across a wide range of cultural contexts. Although we do not necessarily share a single policy perspective with respect to such practices, nor a uniform moral assessment of every feature of them, we are united in a concern about widespread inaccuracies, inconsistencies, double standards, and Western cultural bias in the prevailing discourses on genital cutting of children.[1]
The conference was convened at Brussels in the Fall of 2019 by Attorneys for the Rights of the Child. More than 90 papers were presented.[2] The groups argues that male, female, and intersex cutting must be considered together.[1]
Dr. Shimon Samuels, Director for International Relations for the Wiesenthal Center, in a letter to J. Steven Svoboda of Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, expressed concern that the Brussels Collaboration threatened Abrahamic covenant, now debunked by Professor Leonard Glick,[3] however, he failed to acknowledge that boys born into Jewish families would be major beneficiaries of bodily integrity derived from the protection of their human rights.
References
- ↑ a b
Brussels Collaboration on Bodily Integrity. Medically Unnecessary Genital Cutting and the Rights of the Child: Moving Toward Consensus. Am J Bioeth. October 2019; 19(10): 17-28. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
- ↑
Samuels, Shimon (31 May 2020)."Does an international campaign to ban brit mila contribute to antisemitism?", https://www.jpost.com, The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
- ↑ Divinsky, Eitan (5 March 2020)."Wiesenthal Center slams international campaign to ban circumcision", https://www.israelnationalnews.com, Arutz Sheva. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
