Brian D. Earp: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m add "Zero tolerance for genital mutilation: a review of moral justifications" to publications
Line 21: Line 21:
  |title=The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
  |title=The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
|init=BD
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
Line 32: Line 33:
  |title=The ethics of infant male circumcision
  |title=The ethics of infant male circumcision
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
|init=BD
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
Line 44: Line 46:
  |title=Female genital mutilation (FGM) and male circumcision: Should there be a separate ethical discourse?
  |title=Female genital mutilation (FGM) and male circumcision: Should there be a separate ethical discourse?
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
|init=BD
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
Line 56: Line 59:
  |title=Female genital mutilation and male circumcision: Toward an autonomy-based ethical framework
  |title=Female genital mutilation and male circumcision: Toward an autonomy-based ethical framework
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
|init=BD
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
Line 68: Line 72:
  |title=The need to control for socially desirable responding in studies on the sexual effects of male circumcision
  |title=The need to control for socially desirable responding in studies on the sexual effects of male circumcision
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
|init=BD
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
Line 81: Line 86:
  |title=Sex and circumcision
  |title=Sex and circumcision
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
|init=BD
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
Line 94: Line 100:
  |title=Does science support infant circumcision?
  |title=Does science support infant circumcision?
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
|init=BD
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |last2=Darby
  |last2=Darby
|init2=R
  |first2=Robert
  |first2=Robert
  |author2-link=Robert Darby
  |author2-link=Robert Darby
Line 110: Line 118:
  |title=Strengths and weaknesses in the 2015 Canadian Paediatric Society statement regarding newborn male circumcision
  |title=Strengths and weaknesses in the 2015 Canadian Paediatric Society statement regarding newborn male circumcision
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
|init=BD
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
  |date=2015
  |date=2015
Line 123: Line 132:
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
|init=BD
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |journal=Frontiers in Pediatrics
  |journal=Frontiers in Pediatrics
Line 136: Line 146:
  |first=Adrienne
  |first=Adrienne
  |last=Carmack
  |last=Carmack
|init=A
  |author-link=Adrienne Carmack
  |author-link=Adrienne Carmack
  |first2=Lauren
  |first2=Lauren
  |last2=Notini
  |last2=Notini
|init2=L
  |first3=Brian D.
  |first3=Brian D.
  |last3=Earp
  |last3=Earp
|init3=BD
  |date=2015-10-19
  |date=2015-10-19
  |journal=The Journal of Sex Research
  |journal=The Journal of Sex Research
Line 151: Line 164:
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
|init=BD
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |journal=Journal of Medical Ethics
  |journal=Journal of Medical Ethics
Line 164: Line 178:
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
|init=BD
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |date=2016
  |date=2016
Line 176: Line 191:
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
|init=BD
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |journal=HealthWatch Newsletter
  |journal=HealthWatch Newsletter
Line 187: Line 203:
  |title=Does Circumcision Reduce Penis Sensitivity? The Answer Is Not Clear Cut
  |title=Does Circumcision Reduce Penis Sensitivity? The Answer Is Not Clear Cut
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
|init=BD
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
Line 198: Line 215:
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
|init=BD
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |journal=Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
  |journal=Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Line 211: Line 229:
  |title=Infant circumcision and adult penile sensitivity: Implications for sexual experience
  |title=Infant circumcision and adult penile sensitivity: Implications for sexual experience
  |last=Earp
  |last=Earp
|init=BD
  |first=Brian D.
  |first=Brian D.
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author-link=Brian D. Earp
Line 225: Line 244:
  |last=Frisch
  |last=Frisch
  |first=Morten
  |first=Morten
|init=M
  |author-link=Morten Frisch
  |author-link=Morten Frisch
  |last2=Earp
  |last2=Earp
  |first2=Brian D.
  |first2=Brian D.
|init2=BD
  |author2-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author2-link=Brian D. Earp
  |date=2018
  |date=2018
Line 242: Line 263:
  |last=Myers
  |last=Myers
  |first=Alex
  |first=Alex
|init=A
  |last2=Earp
  |last2=Earp
  |first2=Brian D.
  |first2=Brian D.
|init2=BD
  |author2-link=Brian D. Earp
  |author2-link=Brian D. Earp
  |journal=Bioethics
  |journal=Bioethics
  |volume=
  |volume=34
  |issue=
  |issue=7
  |pages=in press
  |pages=645-63
  |DOI=10.1111/bioe.12714
  |DOI=10.1111/bioe.12714
  |date=2020-02-01
  |date=2020-10
  |accessdate=2020-02-19
  |accessdate=2020-02-19
}}
* {{REFjournal
|url=https://www.academia.edu/43842349/Zero_tolerance_for_genital_mutilation_a_review_of_moral_justifications
|title=Zero tolerance for genital mutilation: a review of moral justifications
|first=Brian D.
|init=BD
|last=Earp
|author-link=Brian D. Earp
|journal=Current Sexual Health Reports
|pages=in press
|date=2020
|accessdate=2020-12-08
}}
}}