Difference between revisions of "Extensive penile skin defect"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Wikify.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text and citation.) |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.05.011 | |DOI=10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.05.011 | ||
|accessdate=2022-01-13 | |accessdate=2022-01-13 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 complications of child circumcision in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant prepuce (51, [14.7%]), hemorrhage (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [Figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound infections and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).<ref name="osifo2010">{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Osifo | ||
| + | |first= | ||
| + | |init=OD | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |last2=Oriaifo | ||
| + | |first2= | ||
| + | |init2=IA | ||
| + | |author2-link= | ||
| + | |etal=no | ||
| + | |title=Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children | ||
| + | |trans-title= | ||
| + | |language= | ||
| + | |journal=Ann Afr Med | ||
| + | |location= | ||
| + | |date=2009-10 | ||
| + | |volume=8 | ||
| + | |issue=4 | ||
| + | |article= | ||
| + | |page= | ||
| + | |pages=266-70 | ||
| + | |url=https://www.annalsafrmed.org/article.asp?issn=1596-3519;year=2009;volume=8;issue=4;spage=266;epage=270;aulast=Osifo | ||
| + | |archived= | ||
| + | |quote= | ||
| + | |pubmedID=20139551 | ||
| + | |pubmedCID= | ||
| + | |DOI=10.4103/1596-3519.59583 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2022-01-23 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 00:38, 24 January 2022
Extensive penile skin defects/avulsion are unfortunate occurrences of male circumcision. Avulsion is the forcible tearing away of a body part by trauma or surgery.[1]
Bode et al. (2010) reported 23 very serious injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring. There was extensive skin loss in 17(74%) babies. Urethrocutaneous fistulae were the result in nine (39%) of these cases, while partial necrosis of the glans penis occurred in four (17%).[2]
Osifo & Oriaifo (2010) reported on 346 complications of child circumcision in Nigeria. Urethrocutaneous fistula (73, [21.1%]), redundant prepuce (51, [14.7%]), hemorrhage (46, [13.3%]), glandular injury (33, [9.5%]), glandulopenile adhesion (30, [8.7%]), implantation cyst (10, [2.9%]) [Figure 1], proximal migration of plastibell ring (11, [3.2%]) and penile tissues avulsions (17, [4.9%]) were more commonly seen than glandular amputations (9, [2.6%]), transmission of infection (4, [1.2%]), local wound infections and penopubic adhesion (2, [0.6%]).[3]
References
- ↑
(2004). Avulsion
, The Free Dictionary. Retrieved 23 January 2022. - ↑
Bode CO, Ikhisemojie S, Ademuyiwa AO. Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring. J Pediatr Urol. February 2010; 6(1): 23-7. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
- ↑ Osifo OD, Oriaifo IA. Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children. Ann Afr Med. October 2009; 8(4): 266-70. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 23 January 2022.
