London v. Glasser et al.: Difference between revisions

Add text.
mNo edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
A petition for review was filed with the [https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/ California Supreme Court], however it was denied.<ref name="morris1989" />
A petition for review was filed with the [https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/ California Supreme Court], however it was denied.<ref name="morris1989" />


Although federal issues were involved that would justify an appeal to [https://www.supremecourt.gov/ United States Supreme Court], financial constraints prevented further appeal.<ref name="morris1989" />
Although federal issues were involved that would justify an appeal to the [https://www.supremecourt.gov/ United States Supreme Court], financial constraints prevented further appeal.<ref name="morris1989" />
== Comment by Intactiwiki ==
== Comment by Intactiwiki ==
Many observers believe this case was wrongly decided. It may be that this case from four decades ago was ahead of its time and would fare better if presented today.
Many observers believe this case was wrongly decided. It may be that this case from four decades ago was ahead of its time and would fare better if presented today.