Intraperitoneal bladder perforation: Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m added interwiki link
Add SEEALSO section; Add LINKS section; Wikify.
Line 17: Line 17:
  |author4-link=
  |author4-link=
  |etal=no
  |etal=no
  |title=Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell Device
  |title=Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the [[Plastibell]] device
  |trans-title=
  |trans-title=
  |language=
  |language=
Line 37: Line 37:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]].<ref>{{REFweb
The seventy-year-old [[Plastibell]] device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]].<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html
  |archived=
  |archived=
Line 102: Line 102:
  |page=
  |page=
  |pages=311-2
  |pages=311-2
  |url=
  |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2528673/
  |archived=
  |archived=
  |quote=
  |quote=
Line 109: Line 109:
  |DOI=
  |DOI=
  |accessdate=2022-02-18
  |accessdate=2022-02-18
}}</ref>  so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision with a Plastibell device.
}}</ref>  so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] with a [[Plastibell]] device.
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Device displacement]]
{{LINKS}}
* [https://www.cirp.org/library/death/ Deaths]


{{REF}}  
{{REF}}  


[[Category:Canada]]
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
[[Category:Medical ethics]]


[[de:Intraperitoneale Blasenperforation]]
[[de:Intraperitoneale Blasenperforation]]

Revision as of 13:05, 26 December 2023

Intraperitoneal bladder perforation is an iatrogenic complication of using the Plastibell device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision of an infant boy.[1]

The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including necrosis of the glans penis.[2] [3] There is a history of Plastibell migration causing death of a previously healthy baby boy,[4] so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision with a Plastibell device.

See also

References

  1. REFjournal Dwyer, Moira, Peffer, Nathan, Fuller, Thomas, Cannon, Glenn. Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell device. Urology. March 2016; 89: 134-6. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
  2. REFweb Day, Danielle (2010). The Perils of Plastibell Circumcision: A Mythical "No Cutting, No Risk" Method, Peaceful Parenting. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
  3. REFjournal Aminsharifi A, Afsar F, Tourchi A. Delayed Glans Necrosis after Circumcision: Role of Testosterone in Salvaging Glans. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. September 2013; 80(9): 791-3. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
  4. REFjournal Coroner, Chief. Circumcision: A minor procedure?. Paediatr Child Health. April 2007; 12(4): 311-2. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 18 February 2022.