Redundant foreskin: Difference between revisions

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikify.
Add text and citation.
Line 32: Line 32:


There is no accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]].
There is no accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]].
==Acroposthion==
A longer [[foreskin]] that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an [[acroposthion]], that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.<ref name="hodges2001">{{REFjournal
|last=Hodges
|first=Frederick M.
|author-link=Frederick M. Hodges
|etal=no
|title=The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Bull. Hist. Med
|location=
|date=2001-09
|volume=75
|issue=3
|pages=375-405
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/history/hodges2/
|quote=
|pubmedID=11568485
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1353/bhm.2001.0119
|accessdate=2019-11-15
}}</ref>


{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}

Revision as of 23:00, 23 June 2024

Redundant foreskin (aka Insufficient foreskin removal) is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]

There is no accepted definition of redundant foreskin.

Acroposthion

A longer foreskin that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an acroposthion, that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.[2]


See also

References