Keratinization: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m faded invalid REFcontribution |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| date=2010-03-27 | | date=2010-03-27 | ||
| accessdate= | | accessdate= | ||
}}</ref> Another study found that "no difference can be clearly visualized between the inner and outer foreskin."<ref>{{REFcontribution | }}</ref> Another study found that "no difference can be clearly visualized between the inner and outer foreskin."<!-- <ref>{{REFcontribution | ||
| contribution=HIV-1 Interactions and Infection in Adult Male Foreskin Explant Cultures | | contribution=HIV-1 Interactions and Infection in Adult Male Foreskin Explant Cultures | ||
| quote=No difference can be clearly visualized between the inner and outer foreskin. | | quote=No difference can be clearly visualized between the inner and outer foreskin. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| date=2009-12-06 | | date=2009-12-06 | ||
| accessdate=2011-06-28 | | accessdate=2011-06-28 | ||
}}</ref> Be that as it may, this hypothesis continues to be popular among researchers who advocate for circumcision as STD prevention. | }}</ref>--> Be that as it may, this hypothesis continues to be popular among researchers who advocate for circumcision as STD prevention. | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||