22,310
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
normalize et al. (AMA)
==Review of the circumcision literature==
Bossio ''et al.'' (2014) conducted a comprehensive review of the circumcision literature. They reported that most research was concentrated on finding a benefit for non-therapeutic circumcision and there were large gaps in the knowledge of the sexual health correlates of male circumcision, including:
* penile sensation
* sexual functioning
}}</ref>
Bossio ''et al.'' made three recommendations:
# That more rigours and consistent methodology be used.