Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision study flaws

3 bytes added, 00:12, 23 August 2021
Wikify "Foreskinned".
}}</ref>
[[Foreskinned ]] doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while [[circumcised doctors]] tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" /> Consequently, the medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized, argumentative, and [[Bias| biased]]. American doctors do research to find reasons to carry out non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="fleiss1999">{{REFbook
|last=Fleiss
|first=Paul
|accessdate=2020-08-03
}}
 
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] (DOC) is a non-profit, educational organization. It does not earn money from performing non-therapeutic circumcision and is not biased by [[financial incentive]]. DOC rejects all of the self-serving statements from the medical trade associations and endorses a statement by the non-profit [http://www.icgi.org/ Coalition for Genital Integrity] (ICGI).
17,052
edits

Navigation menu