Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision study flaws

8 bytes removed, 14:58, 7 June 2021
m
normalize et al. (AMA)
==Review of the circumcision literature==
Bossio ''et al.'' (2014) conducted a comprehensive review of the circumcision literature. They reported that most research was concentrated on finding a benefit for non-therapeutic circumcision and there were large gaps in the knowledge of the sexual health correlates of male circumcision, including:
* penile sensation
* sexual functioning
}}</ref>
Bossio ''et al.'' made three recommendations:
# That more rigours and consistent methodology be used.
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,335
edits

Navigation menu