Difference between revisions of "Circumcised"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Revise text; Add categories.)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Circumcised''' is an adjective applied to the incomplete [[penis]] and to males with an incomplete penis, which has had an essential, functional part (the [[foreskin]]) excised, resulting in a condition of male genital mutilation ([[MGM]]).
 
'''Circumcised''' is an adjective applied to the incomplete [[penis]] and to males with an incomplete penis, which has had an essential, functional part (the [[foreskin]]) excised, resulting in a condition of male genital mutilation ([[MGM]]).
  
''Circumcised'' is a Biblical term. It occurs many times in tbe Holy Bible. The first occurrence is in Genesis 17:10. It also is used as a noun to refer to the Hebrews.
+
''Circumcised'' is a Biblical term. It occurs 43 times in tbe Holy Bible. The first occurrence is in Genesis 17:10. It also is used as a noun to refer to the Hebrews.
  
 
Family Court Judge Sir James Munby ruled in the case of [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3| B & G]] that excision of the functional [[foreskin]] of the penis constituted "significant harm''.<ref>Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]</ref>
 
Family Court Judge Sir James Munby ruled in the case of [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3| B & G]] that excision of the functional [[foreskin]] of the penis constituted "significant harm''.<ref>Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]</ref>

Revision as of 12:28, 10 June 2022

Circumcised is an adjective applied to the incomplete penis and to males with an incomplete penis, which has had an essential, functional part (the foreskin) excised, resulting in a condition of male genital mutilation (MGM).

Circumcised is a Biblical term. It occurs 43 times in tbe Holy Bible. The first occurrence is in Genesis 17:10. It also is used as a noun to refer to the Hebrews.

Family Court Judge Sir James Munby ruled in the case of B & G that excision of the functional foreskin of the penis constituted "significant harm.[1]

References

  1. Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]