Difference between revisions of "Intraperitoneal bladder perforation"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(Revise text and add citation.)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
  
The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues.<ref>{{REFweb
+
The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including [[necrosis]] of the [[glans penis]].<ref>{{REFweb
 
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html
 
  |url=http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-perils-of-plastibell-circumcision.html
 
  |archived=
 
  |archived=
Line 52: Line 52:
 
  |format=
 
  |format=
 
  |quote=
 
  |quote=
 +
}}</ref> <ref name="aminsharifi2013">{{REFjournal
 +
|last=Aminsharifi
 +
|first=
 +
|init=A
 +
|author-link=
 +
|last2=Afsar
 +
|first2=
 +
|init2=F
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|last3=Tourchi
 +
|first3=
 +
|init3=A
 +
|author3-link=
 +
|etal=no
 +
|title=Delayed Glans Necrosis after Circumcision: Role of Testosterone in Salvaging Glans
 +
|trans-title=
 +
|language=
 +
|journal=The Indian Journal of Pediatrics
 +
|location=
 +
|date=2013-09
 +
|volume=80
 +
|issue=9
 +
|article=
 +
|page=
 +
|pages=791-3
 +
|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12098-012-0820-y
 +
|archived=
 +
|quote=
 +
|pubmedID=22752705
 +
|pubmedCID=
 +
|DOI=10.1007/s12098-012-0820-y
 +
|accessdate=2022-01-19
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
 
There is a history of Plastibell migration causing [[death]] of a previously healthy baby boy,<ref name="coroner2007">{{REFjournal
 
There is a history of Plastibell migration causing [[death]] of a previously healthy baby boy,<ref name="coroner2007">{{REFjournal

Revision as of 13:05, 19 February 2022

Intraperitoneal bladder perforation is an iatrogenic complication of using the Plastibell device to perform a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision of an infant boy.[1]

The seventy-year-old Plastibell device has a long history of migrating from its intended position where it may cause blockage of urination and other issues, up to and including necrosis of the glans penis.[2] [3] There is a history of Plastibell migration causing death of a previously healthy baby boy,[4] so there is a very substantial question concerning the medical judgment of any physician who performs a non-beneficial, medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision with a Plastibell device.

References

  1. REFjournal Dwyer, Moira, Peffer, Nathan, Fuller, Thomas, Cannon, Glenn. Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation and Life-threatening Renal Failure in a Neonate Following Circumcision With the Plastibell Device. Urology. March 2016; 89: 134-6. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
  2. REFweb Day, Danielle (2010). The Perils of Plastibell Circumcision: A Mythical "No Cutting, No Risk" Method, Peaceful Parenting. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
  3. REFjournal Aminsharifi A, Afsar F, Tourchi A. Delayed Glans Necrosis after Circumcision: Role of Testosterone in Salvaging Glans. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. September 2013; 80(9): 791-3. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
  4. REFjournal Coroner, Chief. Circumcision: A minor procedure?. Paediatr Child Health. April 2007; 12(4): 311-2. PMID. PMC. Retrieved 18 February 2022.