Difference between revisions of "New Zealand"
m (added author-links) |
m (wikified the editor names) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_8 A | |url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_8 A | ||
|work= | |work= | ||
| − | |editor=George C. Denniston, Frederick Mansfield Hodges, and Marilyn Fayre Milos | + | |editor=[[George C. Denniston]], [[Frederick M. Hodges|Frederick Mansfield Hodges]], and [[Marilyn Milos|Marilyn Fayre Milos]] |
|edition= | |edition= | ||
|volume= | |volume= | ||
Revision as of 02:05, 28 September 2019
Circumcision in New Zealand
The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic medically unnecessary circumcision in New Zealand rose to about 95 percent in the 1940s. The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision started to decline about 1950. It was reported at 0.35 percent among white New Zealanders in 1995.[1]
The males in New Zealand who are circumcised are mostly older men. The percentage of males who are circumcised is gradually declining as older males die off and are replaced by younger intact males. Almost no one under 25-years-of-age is circumcised.
The Maori people who constitute about 17 percent of the population do not circumcise.
It is said that the small Jewish population have to fly in a mohel if they want to have a son circumcised.
The Pacific Island people who constitute 8.1 percent of the population are an exception. The Pacific Islanders circumcise as part of their culture.
External links
- Young H, McGrath K. The rise and fall of circumcision in New Zealand. Circumstitions. 8 December 2000.
References
- ↑
McGrath, Ken, Young, Hugh (2001): Understanding Circumcision
, in: A Review of Circumcision in New Zealand. George C. Denniston, Frederick Mansfield Hodges, and Marilyn Fayre Milos (ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. Pp. 129-146. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
